Oudinot-Robertson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 25

OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 20 . Signed on 9/21/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEDFORD DIVISION ELLEN OUDINOT-ROBERTSON, Case No. 1: 16-cv-00882-JR OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. AIKEN, Judge: On August 7, 2017, Magistrate Judge Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F &R") (doc. 20), recommending this Court reverse and remand for further proceedings in this Social Security disability appeal. The F&R is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. I review de nova those p01iions of the F&R to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C); accord Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Holder v. Holder, 392 F.3d 1009, 1022 (9th Cir. 2004). Judge Russo concluded the ALJ erred at step two when he determined plaintiffs fibromyalgia was not a medically determinable impairment. The Commissioner argues any error Page 1 - OPINION AND ORDER at step two was harmless because the ALJ took fibromyalgia symptoms such as pain and fatigue into consideration when foimulating the RFC. The Commissioner faults Judge Russo for adopting a "per se hamrful enor rule." Obj. F&R 3. To the contrary, Judge Russo correctly applied the harmless enor rule, which requires remand unless the record clearly shows the ALJ considered, at step four and/or five, limitations posed by the impairment excluded at step two. See Lewis v. Astrue, 498 F.3d 909, 911 (9th Cir. 2007). Judge Russo carefully parsed the ALJ's decision and found evidence the ALJ had deliberately excluded fibromyalgia symptoms from consideration at steps four and five. In her objections, the Commissioner cites other portions of the ALJ' s decision that purportedly show the ALJ did, in fact, consider those symptoms in f01mulating the RFC. Even assuming the Commissioner's inte1pretation of the evidence is conect, conflicting evidence renders the decision ambiguous. That ambiguity prevents me from finding the error at step two harmless. Having perfo1med an independent review of the record, I agree that the ALJ harmfully eiTed at step two. I ADOPT Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 20). This case is REVERSED AND REMANDED for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this Z,/ Paf:"f~~!.-IUi~ff.cJ.tJ.¥ AnnAiken United States District Judge Page 2 - OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?