Shelley et al v. Interfor U.S. Inc.
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint/Petition 36 ; Adopting Findings and Recommendation 48 ; Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 28 ). Amended Complaint is due 8/25/2017. Signed on 7/25/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
ANTHONY BAKER, TIMOTHY COOPER &
Case No. 1:16 CV 01415-CL
INTERFOR U.S. INC., dba INTERFOR
Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 15, 2017.
The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No
objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual
findings de novo review. Lorin Cotp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.
1982). See also Biitt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal p1inciples de novo, I find no efi'or.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and
thistl~ of July, 2017.
Ann Aiken, United States District Judge
Order -- Page 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?