Audubon Society of Portland et al v. Jewell et al

Filing 238

OPINION AND ORDER: Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation 215 is adopted. Motions and cross-motions for summary judgment 143 , 146 , 157 , 159 , 161 , and 162 are GRANTED. Motion 148 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The remaining motions, including motion to strike 232 , are DENIED. Signed on 4/6/2020 by Judge Michael J. McShane. Associated Cases: 1:17-cv-00069-CL, 1:17-cv-00098-CL, 1:17-cv-00468-CL, 1:17-cv-00531-CL (cp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON AUDOBAN SOCIETY OF PORTLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, 1:17-cv-69-CL (lead) 1:17-cv-98-CL (trailing) 1:17-cv-468-CL (trailing) 1:17-cv-531-CL (trailing) v. JUDGMENT RYAN ZINKE, et al., Defendants. TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Numerous parties filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. 1 –ORDER v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 215) is adopted. Motions and cross-motions for summary judgment ## 143, 146, 157, 159, 161, and 162 are GRANTED. Motion # 148 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The remaining motions, including motion to strike # 232, are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 6th day of April, 2020. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 2 –ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?