Kelly v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 21 . The decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for DIB is Reversed and Remanded for an award of benefits pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed on 9/27/18 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
GARY K.,
No. 1:17-cv-00452-JR
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation [21] on June 29, 2018,
in which he recommends that the Court reverse and remand for an award of benefits the
Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for Disability Insurance Benefits
(“DIB”). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.
Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak’s Findings and Recommendation [21]. The
decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff’s application for DIB is REVERSED and
REMANDED for an award of benefits pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of ________________, 2018
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?