Moulin et al v. City of Central Point et al
Filing
29
ORDER: The Court has considered Defendants Objections to Magistrate Judges Order 27 , reviewed the record, and finds no error in Judge Clarkes Order. Signed on 12/27/2017 by Judge Michael J. McShane. (cp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
JOSHUA MOULIN,
Plaintiff,
No. 1:17-cv-00857-CL
v.
ORDER
CITY OF CENTRAL POINT;
KRISTINE ALLISON; MICHAEL
ANDERSON; BRIAN DAY;
DARIN LUX; DARIN TWEEDT,
Defendants.
_______________________________________
McSHANE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Objections to Magistrate Judge
Clarke’s Order granting Plaintiff’s motion for a protective Order. ECF Nos. 25, 27.
Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) requires that the district judge “consider timely objections and
modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”
The Court has considered Defendants’ Objections, reviewed the record, and finds no
error in Judge Clarke’s Order.
It is so ORDERED and DATED this 27th day of December, 2017.
s/Michael J. McShane
MICHAEL McSHANE
United States District Judge
Page 1 – ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?