Harrison v. 1-800-Flowers Team Services, Inc. et al
Filing
69
ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' submissions, I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's F&R 64 in its entirety. Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification and for the Issuance of Court-Supervised Notice 45 is GRANTED. Further, the joint Consent Motion 68 is also GRANTED. The stipulated class definition and proposed Notice and Consent Forms are approved. Signed on 1/15/2019 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
MEDFORD DIVISION
JENNIFER HARRISON, on behalf of
Herself and other similarly situated,
Case No. 1: 18-cv-00410-CL
ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.
HARRY & DAVID OPERATIONS, INC.,
And HARRY AND DAVID, LLC,
Defendants.
AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F &R") (doc.
64) on 12/13/2018 recommending that plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Ce1iification and for
the Issuance of Court-Supervised Notice (doc 45) should be granted. The matter is now before
this Court. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
Subsequent to Magistrate Judge Clarke filing his F &R, the parties filed a Consent Motion
to Approve Collective Class Definition and FSLA Notice Form. (doc. 68) There, the pmiies
represented that they do not object the F&R and ask this Court to approve the class certification
as well as the stipulated proposed Notice and Consent Fonns.
PAGE I -ORDER
Having reviewed the parties' submissions, I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's F&R (doc.
64) in its entirety. Accordingly, plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Certification and for the
Issuance of Comt-Supervised Notice (doc 45) is GRANTED. Further, the joint Consent Motion
(doc. 68) is also GRANTED. The stipulated class definition and proposed Notice and Consent
Forms are approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this /5"ctay of January 2019.
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge
PAGE2-0RDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?