Thompson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
15
ORDER: Granting Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA 12 ; Granting Motion to Bifurcate 12 . Signed on 03/06/2025 by Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke. (rsm)
Alan Stuart Graf, OSB # 923171
alanstuartgraf@gmail.com
825 Merrimon Ave, Ste C # 354
Asheville, NC 28804
Phone No: 931-231-4119
Fax No. 931-964-3127
Email: alanstuartgraf@gmail.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
JOSHUA T.
1:24-CV-0 1772-CL
Plaintiff,
V.
ORDER FOR EQUAL
ACCESS TO WSTICE
FEES
Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
Based upon the stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff is here by awarded $1,350.09 in fees under
the EAJA. Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this
Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S. C.
ยง 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and not to
Plaintiff s attorney. If, afterreceiving the Court' s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner ( 1) determines
that Plaintiff has assigned his right to EAJA fees to his attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does
not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive
the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiffs
attorney.
Ill
Ill
Ill
ORDER-I
However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner
cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining BAJA fees
after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff s attorney at the
following address: Alan Stuart Graf, Attorn~y, 825 Merriman Ave, Ste C, PMB # 354, Asheville,
NC 28804.
It is so ORDERED
Dated this 6th
Prepared as to form
Isl Alan Graf
Attorney for Plaintiff
ORDER-2
day of March, 2025
Isl Mark Clarke
MARK D. CLARKE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?