Quimby v. Aveson et al
Filing
13
OPINION & ORDER: Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (# 11 ) on February 11, 2009, recommending that defendant Ashdown Project's Motion to Dismiss (# 4 ) be granted. The matter is now before this court pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to review the factual or legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. See, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (198 5); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9'h Cir. 2003). After review, I agree with Judge Sullivan's Recommendation. There is no legal error. The court adopts Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings and Recommendations (# 11 ). Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (# 4 ) is granted.Signed on April 1, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
FREDDIE B U S B Y QUIMBY,
CV. 08-1057 SU
Plaintiff,
O P I N I O N AND O R D E R
v.
K E N T A V E S O N and A S H D O W N PROJECT LLC, Defendants.
REDDEN, Judge: Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (# I I ) on February I I , 2009, recommending that defendant Ashdown Project's Motion to Dismiss (#4) be granted. The matter is now before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ( B ) and Fed. R. Civ. P.
neb).
OPINION AND ORDER- I
When, as here, no o b j e c t i o n s are filed, t h e c o u r t is n o t r e q u i r e d to r e v i e w the factual o r legal c o n c l u s i o n s o f t h e M a g i s t r a t e Judge. See, Thomas v. Arn, 4 7 4 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F . 3 d 1114, 1121 (9'h Cir. 2003).
A f t e r r e v i e w , I a g r e e w i t h J u d g e S u l l i v a n ' s R e c o m m e n d a t i o n . T h e r e is n o l e g a l e r r o r . T h e c o u r t a d o p t s M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e S u l l i v a n ' s F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s (# I I ) . D e f e n d a n t ' s M o t i o n t o D i s m i s s ( # 4 ) is g r a n t e d . IT IS S O O R D E R E D . Dated this
-.L day of April, 2009.
en States D i s t r i c t Judge
OPINION AND ORDER- 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?