Nickelson v. Mills

Filing 34

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 32 . See formal ORDER. Copy of ORDER sent to Pro Se Petitioner. Signed on 5/12/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RODNEY NICKELSON, Petitioner, Case No. 2:13 CV 00291-CL v. ORDER DON MILLS, Respondent. Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on Aprill3, 2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation. Dated this / J-day ofMay, 2015. Ann Aiken, United States District Judge Order -- Page 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?