Nickelson v. Mills
Filing
34
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 32 . See formal ORDER. Copy of ORDER sent to Pro Se Petitioner. Signed on 5/12/2015 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
RODNEY NICKELSON,
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:13 CV 00291-CL
v.
ORDER
DON MILLS,
Respondent.
Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation on Aprill3, 2015.
The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No
objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual
findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir.
1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Clarke's Findings and
Recommendation.
Dated this / J-day ofMay, 2015.
Ann Aiken, United States District Judge
Order -- Page 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?