Pringle v. State of Oregon et al
Filing
59
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation 56 . Accordingly, the Department of Interior's Motion to Dismiss 53 is granted, Attorney General Holder's Motion to Dismiss 54 is granted, and Mr. Pringle's Amended Complaint 4 is dismissed, without prejudice. Signed on 8/7/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DAYTON PRINGLE, JR.
Plaintiff,
v.
No. 3:13-cv-00309-SU
ORDER
STATE OF OREGON, JOHN KITZHABER,
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
ERIC HOLDER, et al.
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [56] on June 30, 2014,
in which she recommends that this Court grant the Department of Interior’s Motion to Dismiss
[53], grant Attorney General Holder’s Motion to Dismiss [54], and dismiss Mr. Pringle’s
Amended Complaint [4].
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings & Recommendation [56].
Accordingly, the Department of Interior’s Motion to Dismiss [53] is granted, Attorney General
Holder’s Motion to Dismiss [54] is granted, and Mr. Pringle’s Amended Complaint [4] is
dismissed, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
day of
, 2014.
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?