Pringle v. State of Oregon et al

Filing 59

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation 56 . Accordingly, the Department of Interior's Motion to Dismiss 53 is granted, Attorney General Holder's Motion to Dismiss 54 is granted, and Mr. Pringle's Amended Complaint 4 is dismissed, without prejudice. Signed on 8/7/2014 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DAYTON PRINGLE, JR. Plaintiff, v. No. 3:13-cv-00309-SU ORDER STATE OF OREGON, JOHN KITZHABER, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER, et al. Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation [56] on June 30, 2014, in which she recommends that this Court grant the Department of Interior’s Motion to Dismiss [53], grant Attorney General Holder’s Motion to Dismiss [54], and dismiss Mr. Pringle’s Amended Complaint [4]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan’s Findings & Recommendation [56]. Accordingly, the Department of Interior’s Motion to Dismiss [53] is granted, Attorney General Holder’s Motion to Dismiss [54] is granted, and Mr. Pringle’s Amended Complaint [4] is dismissed, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this day of , 2014. MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?