Christian v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections Director et al

Filing 47

OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubels recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 44 as my own opinion. Signed on 11/25/14 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION LEO JAMES CHRISTIAN, No. 2:13-cv-00435-HU Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, J., On October 7, 2014, Magistrate Judge Hubel issued his Findings and Recommendation [44], recommending that (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [27] be GRANTED, (2) declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claim under Article I, Section 16 of the Oregon Constitution, and (3) dismissing this action. No objections to the Findings and Recommendation were filed. DISCUSSION The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge, but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court 1 – OPINION AND ORDER is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubel’s recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R [44] as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 25th day of November, 2014. /s/ Michael W. Mosman____ MICHAEL W. MOSMAN United States District Judge 2 – OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?