Weidner v. Taylor
OPINION AND ORDER. Upon careful review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 76 as my own opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 1/17/2017 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
COREY IAN WEIDNER,
No. 2: l 3-cv-01973-YY
OPINION AND ORDER
On August 30, 2016, Magistrate Judge Youlee You issued her Findings and
Recommendation ("F&R") , recommending that I DENY Mr. Weidner's Petition for Habeas
Corpus  and DISMISS the case with prejudice. Judge You also recommended that I issue a
Certificate of Appealability as to all of Mr. Weidner' s argued claims. Mr. Weidner filed his
Objections to the F&R  on November 2, 2016, and Ms. Taylor filed her Response to the
Objections  on November 16, 2016.
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
1 - OPINION AND ORDER
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court
is not required to review, de nova or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F &R
depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,
or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C).
Upon careful review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R
 as my own opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
J1~ of January, 2017.
Chief United States District Judge
2 - OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?