Floyd v. Watkins

Filing 34

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation 30 , and therefore, grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 . See 2-page order attached. Signed on 8/25/2015 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

WILLIAM PATRICK FLOYD,
Plaintiff,

No. 2:14-cv-01775-SB

v.
OFFICER WATKINS, in individual
and official capacities,

ORDER

Defendant.

HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation [30] on July 16,
2015, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [24]. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt,
840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate
1 – ORDER

Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de
novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings & Recommendation [30],
and therefore, grants Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [24].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ____________________ day of __________________________, 2015.

________________________________________________
MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 – ORDER