Voth v. Nooth et al

Filing 25

ORDER: On February 27, 2015, this Court issued an Order 20 denying Plaintiff's first Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (which the Court converted to a motion for preliminary injunction), For the same reasons set forth in the Cour t's February 27, 2015, Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for TRO 15 , request for release from the Disciplinary Segregation Unit 23 , and Second Supplemental Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 24 . Signed on 3/12/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON FRANK E. VOTH, Case No. 2:14-cv-01855-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. MARK NOOTH, et al., Defendants. MOSMAN, Judge. Plaintiff, an inmate at the Snake River Correctional Institution ("SRCI") brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 u.s.c. ยง 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for TRO (#15), Reply to Defendants' Response to Motion for TRO ( lt23) in which the Plaintiff seeks release from the SRCI Disciplinary Segregation Unit, and Plaintiff's Second Supplemental Motion for TRO (il24). On February 27, 2015, this Court issued an Order ( #20) denying Plaintiff's first Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 1 - ORDER - (which the Court injunction), For February 27, converted the 2015, to a motion same reasons set Order, the forth Court for in DENIES preliminary the Court's Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for TRO ( lt15), request for release from the Disciplinary Segregation Unit (#23), and Second Supplemental Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (lf24) , IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this ~day of March, 2015. MW w. Michael United States 2 - ORDER - Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?