Voth v. Nooth et al
Filing
25
ORDER: On February 27, 2015, this Court issued an Order 20 denying Plaintiff's first Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (which the Court converted to a motion for preliminary injunction), For the same reasons set forth in the Cour t's February 27, 2015, Order, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion for TRO 15 , request for release from the Disciplinary Segregation Unit 23 , and Second Supplemental Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 24 . Signed on 3/12/15 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (Mailed copy to plaintiff) (dsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
FRANK E. VOTH,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01855-AC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
MARK NOOTH, et al.,
Defendants.
MOSMAN, Judge.
Plaintiff,
an
inmate
at
the
Snake
River
Correctional
Institution ("SRCI") brings this civil rights action pursuant to
42
u.s.c.
ยง
1983.
Currently before the Court are Plaintiff's
Supplemental Motion for TRO (#15), Reply to Defendants' Response
to Motion for TRO ( lt23) in which the Plaintiff seeks release from
the SRCI Disciplinary Segregation Unit,
and Plaintiff's Second
Supplemental Motion for TRO (il24).
On
February
27,
2015,
this
Court
issued
an
Order
( #20)
denying Plaintiff's first Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
1 - ORDER -
(which
the
Court
injunction),
For
February
27,
converted
the
2015,
to
a
motion
same
reasons
set
Order,
the
forth
Court
for
in
DENIES
preliminary
the
Court's
Plaintiff's
Supplemental Motion for TRO ( lt15), request for release from the
Disciplinary
Segregation
Unit
(#23),
and
Second
Supplemental
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (lf24) ,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
~day
of March, 2015.
MW w.
Michael
United States
2 - ORDER -
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?