Vanderpool v. Nooth
ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation 34 . The Court Denies Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 2 Pursuant to § 2254, Dismisses this matter with prejudice, and Denies a certificate of appealability. Signed on 3/21/17 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (gm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
AUSTIN EMORY VANDERPOOL,
Superindendant Oregon State
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and
Recommendation (#34) on February 14, 2017, in which he recommends
this Court deny the Petition (#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pursuant to § 2254, dismiss this matter, and deny a certificate
The matter is now before this Court pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
72 (b) •
1 - ORDER
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and
Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its
obligation to review the record de nova.
561 F. 3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009).
See Dawson v. Marshall,
See also United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en bane).
Having reviewed the legal principles de nova, the Court does not
find any error.
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Petition
(#2) for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to § 2254, DISMISSES this
matter with prejudice, and DENIES a certificate of appealability.
DATED this 2ist day of March, 2017.
United States District Judge
2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?