Gramajo v. Nooth
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER. Upon review, I agree with Judge You's order and I DENY Petitioner's Motion for Discovery 55 . IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/25/2019 by Chief Judge Michael W. Mosman. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EBER GRAMAJO,
Case No. 2:15-cv-2341-YY
Petitioner,
v.
OPINION AND ORDER
MARKNOOTH,
Superintendent, Snake River Correctional
Institution,
Defendant.
MOSMAN,J.,
On March 29, 2019, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Order [70], directing
that Petitioner's Motion for Discovery [55] be DENIED. Petitioner objected [86], and Defendant
filed a response [92].
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the
court is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal
conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are
1 - OPINION AND ORDER
addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328
F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). If the magistrate judge has ruled on a non-dispositive matter,
her decision is modified only if clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The court is not required,
however, to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the
magistrate judge as to those portions of the order to which no objections are addressed. Id.
While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the order depends on whether
objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject, or modify any part of the
order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C).
CONCLUSION
Upon review, I agree with Judge You's order and I DENY Petitioner's Motion for
Discovery [5 5].
IT IS SO ORDERED.
,.,
DATED this
~-
l/S
day of September, 2019.
MICHAEL W. OSMAN
Chief United Sates District Judge
2 - OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?