Scott v. Myrick et al
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 77 as my own opinion. Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 58 and Motion for Summary Judgment 63 are GRANTED. Signed on 12/8/17 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Everett Scott, Prisoner ID: 3508819) (dsg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
EVERETT JAMES SCOTT,
OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN MYRICK, et al.,
On September 18, 2017, Magistrate Judge Youlee Yim You issued her Findings and
Recommendation (F&R) , recommending that Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary
Judgment  and Motion for Summary Judgment  should be GRANTED. Plaintiff Scott
did not file objections.
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The corut is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). However, the court
1 - OPINION AND ORDER
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R
depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,
or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge You's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R  as
my own opinion. Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment  and Motion for
Sunnnary Judgment  are GRANTED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
ates District Judge
2 - OPINION AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?