Pedro v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 30

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 26 . Signed on 10/27/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PENDLETON DIVISION

PAMELA PEDRO,

2:16-cv-01599-CL

ORDER
Plaintiff,
vs.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.

AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Mark Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F &R") (doc. 26) on
8116/2017, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for
fmther proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any po1tion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district
court must make a de nova determination of that p01tion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d
1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

PAGE 1 -ORDER

Timely objections and a response have been filed by the patties.
I find no eirnr and concur with Magistrate Judge Clarke's analysis of the factual and legal
issues in this case.
Therefore, I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's F&R (doc. 26) in its entirety. The decision
of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for fmther proceedings consistent with the F&R.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated

thi~y of October, 2017.

Ann Aiken
United States District Judge

PAGE 2 -ORDER