Pedro v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 30

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 26 . Signed on 10/27/2017 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PENDLETON DIVISION PAMELA PEDRO, 2:16-cv-01599-CL ORDER Plaintiff, vs. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. AIKEN, District Judge: Magistrate Mark Clarke filed his Findings and Recommendation ("F &R") (doc. 26) on 8116/2017, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for fmther proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any po1tion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that p01tion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). PAGE 1 -ORDER Timely objections and a response have been filed by the patties. I find no eirnr and concur with Magistrate Judge Clarke's analysis of the factual and legal issues in this case. Therefore, I adopt Magistrate Judge Clarke's F&R (doc. 26) in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed and remanded for fmther proceedings consistent with the F&R. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated thi~y of October, 2017. Ann Aiken United States District Judge PAGE 2 -ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?