Carroll v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
21
ORDER: The Court adopts the F&R 17 in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action is dismissed. Signed on 9/18/2019 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PENDLETON DIVISION
DAWNC.,
Case No. 2:18-cv-00194-CL
1
ORDER
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
AIKEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge lviark Clarke has filed his Findings and Recommendation
("F&R") (doc. 17) recommending that the decision of Commissioner be affirmed. This
case is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the
district court must make a de nouo determination of that portion of the magistrate
judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); McDonnell Douglas Corp. u. Commodore
1
In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last
name of the non-governmental pmiy or parties in this case. Where applicable, this opinion uses
the same designation for a non-governmental party's immediate family member.
Page 1 - ORDER
Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S.
920 (1982). Plaintiff has filed timely objections (doc. 19) to the F&R and defendant's
have filed a timely response to those objections. (doc. 20) Thus, this Court reviews
the F&R de nova.
Having reviewed the objections as well as the entire file of this case, the Court
finds no error in Judge Clarke's F&R. Accordingly, the Court adopts the F&R (doc.
17) in its entirety. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action
is dismissed.
It is so ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2019.
Ann Aiken
United States District Judge
Page 2 - ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?