Wonnacott v. Oregon Department of Corrections

Filing 100

ORDER: Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation 97 . Defendant Carpenter's Motion for Summary Judgment 89 is Granted. Signed on 4/5/24 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (Deposited in outgoing mail to pro se party on 4/5/24.) (gm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

DAVID EDGAR WONNACOTT,
Plaintiff,

No. 2:19-cv-00567-JR
ORDER

v.
CAPTAIN DAVID HEEHN, et al.,
Defendants.
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 28, 2024, in
which she recommends that the Court grant Defendant Richard Carpenter’s Motion for Summary
Judgment. F&R, ECF 97. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were
timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v.

1 – ORDER

Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of
Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal
principles de novo, the Court finds no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [97].
Accordingly, Defendant Carpenter’s Motion for Summary Judgment [89] is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

April 5, 2024
DATED: __________________________.

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ
United States District Judge

2 – ORDER