Whitley v. City of Portland et al

Filing 183

ORDER - Adopting Findings and Recommendation 171 . IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 8/12/09 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (peg)

Fll.ED'09 AiX; 121Sl54tsoc-(81

I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON N I C O L E WHITLEY, C i v i l No. 07-1114-AC Plaintiff, v. T h e C I T Y OF PORTLAND, a n d ROBERT DAY, i n h i s i n d i v i d u a l capacity as a police officer for the Portland Police Bureau, ORDER

Defendants.

MARSH, J u d g e . Magistrate and is and any Judge John
V.

Acosta Ma y 20 , 28

filed 2009 ·
§

his The

Findings matter

Reconunendation now Fed. before R. me

(#171)

on

pursuant P. 72 (b) . the district

to

U.S.C. either

6 3 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) (B) objects to and

Civ.

When

party

portion

of the

Magistrate's court must

Findings make a de

Recommendation,

novo

1-

ORDER

determination report. Corp. 1309, (1982). Plaintiff portions timely of filed See

of 28

that U.S.C.
§

portion

of

the

Magistrate's Douglas F.2d 920

636(b) (1) (C); Machines, cert.

McDonnell Inc. , 455 656

v.
1313

Commodore (9th Cir.

Business 1981),

denied,

U.S.

timely the Findings response an

filed and

numerous

objections

to

Recommendation. to fact the

Defendants Magistrate's summary Title I have Having
I

a
that

objecting of

determination judgment VII and on Or.
a

issue

prevents under

plaintiff's Rev. de Stat.
novo

retaliation 659.030(f) . review of

claims

Therefore, this lengthy case.

conducted thoroughly conclude error.

examined that they

the are

parties' without

objections,
I

merit

and

find

no

Accordingly,

I

ADOPT

the

Findings

and

Recommendation

( # 1 7 1 ) o f M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e J o h n V. A c o s t a . I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s

IZ

d a y o f AUGUST, 2 0 0 9 .

Malcolm F. Marsh United States District Judge

I~?~

2-

ORDER