Lane v. Hood River County et al

Filing 56

ORDER: Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 18 ; Adopting Findings and Recommendation 53 . This matter is dismissed with prejudice. Signed on 6/11/09 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (ljl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JOSHUA D. LANE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY, a public entity; EDWARD CANNON; DENISE FOR; DEAN GUESS; and DAVID MERIWETHER, Defendants. BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#53) on March 20, 2009, in which she recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) and enter a Judgment in favor of Defendants. The matter is now 08-CV-428-ST ORDER

before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 1 ORDER

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley

Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)(rev'd on other grounds). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., 700 F.2d Having reviewed the legal principles

1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983).

de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#53). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants'

Motion for Summary Judgment (#18) and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 11th day of June, 2009.

/s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge

2

-

ORDER