Powell's Books, Inc. et al v. Myers et al
Declaration of Michael Powell. Filed by all plaintiffs. (eo)
Powell's Books, Inc. et al v. Myers et al
P.K. Runkles-Pearson, OSB No. 061911 email@example.com S T O E L RIVES LLP 900 S W Fifth Avenue, Suite 2600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 224-3380 Facsimile: (503) 220-2480 Michael A. Bamberger firstname.lastname@example.org Rachel G. Balaban email@example.com SONNENSCHEIN NATH & ROSENTHAL LLP 1221 Avenue o f the Americas, 24th Floor New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 768-6700 Facsimile: ( 2 1 2 ) 7 6 8 - 6 8 0 0 A t t o r n e y s f o r Plaintiffs
U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT C O U R T DISTRICT OF OREGON
POWELL'S BOOKS, INC., e t a t , Plaintiffs,
CV '08-0 501. -
DECLARATION OF MICHAEL POWELL
HARDY MYERS, in his official capacity as ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OREGON, et a t , Defendants.
Michael Powell, declares under penalties o f perjury: Background 1. I am the o w n e r o f Powell's Book's, Inc. ("Powell's"), a plaintiff in this
action. I submit this affidavit on behalf o f Powell's in support o f plaintiffs' motion f o r a preliminary injunction to enjoin the State from enforcing D R S 167.051 to 167.057 (collectively referred to as the "Statute"), an unconstitutional censorship law which will apply to mainstream book stores such as Powell's.
Powell's is one o f the oldest and largest bookstores in Oregon, started in
1971. There are six locations in the Portland metropolitan area, f o u r full-service bookstores (Powell's City o f Books, Powell's a t C e d a r Hills Crossing, Powell's on Hawthorne, and Powell's a t PDX) and two specialty stores (Powell's Technical Books and Powell's Books f o r Home and Garden). The f o u r general retail bookstores primarily carry, and display f o r purchase, books and magazines and caters t o persons o f all ages. P o w e l l ' s a l s o has a w e b s i t e a t w w w . p o w e l l s . c o m . s e r v i n g c u s t o m e r s w o r l d w i d e . T h e books are organized by category and in some instances, by further sub-categories, f o r ease o f reference. For example, there is a "photography" category broken into several sub-categories, including "erotica." There also is a "graphic novels" category that includes, among others, an "erotica" sub-category containing hundreds o f different books. In addition, the website includes a category entitled "gay & lesbian studies," that includes a "sexuality and wellness" sub-category. F e a r O f Prosecution U n d e r t h e S t a t u t e
Powell's fears that it may be at risk o f criminal prosecution under the
S t a t u t e f o r p e r m i t t i n g minors t o a c c e s s o r p u r c h a s e c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y - p r o t e c t e d m a t e r i a l a t o u r bookstores o r on-line, which could be deemed "sexually explicit" o r t o appeal to a person's "sexual desires" under the meaning o f the Statute. Powell's, however, does n o t know how t o determine what books may cross the vague lines established under the Statute.
Under the Statute, it is a crime t o furnish "sexually explicit material" to
anyone u n d e r the age o f 13 i f the person "intentionally furnishes a child, o r intentionally permits a child t o view, sexually explicit material and the person knows that the material is sexually explicit material." ORS 167.054. Such material includes that which contains visual images -- including paintings and drawings -- o f masturbation, intercourse o r genital/oral/anal contact between people and animals. See ORS 167.051. "[F]urnish" is defined broadly, including "to sell, give, rent, loan o r otherwise provide." See ORS 167.051. 5. There are two exceptions under ORS 167.054. First, certain persons,
i n c l u d i n g e m p l o y e e s o f m u s e u m s , schools, o r p u b l i c l i b r a r i e s , a r e n o t l i a b l e . P o w e l l ' s does not fall into this exception. Second, Powell's would not be liable i f the sexually explicit portions o f the material furnished, o r permitted t o be viewed, "form merely an incidental part o f an otherwise nonoffending whole and serve some purpose other than titillation." I believe this exception is vague and do not understand what specific material would fit under this exception.
U n d e r t h e Statute, i t i s a crime i f a person d i s s e m i n a t e s t o a n y o n e u n d e r
the age o f 18 a "visual representation o r explicit verbal description o r narrative account o f s e x u a l c o n d u c t " f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f "arousing o r s a t i s f y i n g t h e s e x u a l d e s i r e s o f t h e person o r the minor . . . " D R S 167.057. I understand this is a very broad provision encompassing material with textual descriptions, as well as visual depictions. I also believe t h a t the phrase "arousing o r satisfying t h e sexual desires," which is undefined under the Statute, is vague. In addition, this section contains the same undefined and vague "incidental part" exception.
M y understanding is that Powell's risks criminal prosecution f o r fu rnishing
c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l y - p r o t e c t e d m a t e r i a l s d e s c r i b e d a b o v e t o p e r s o n s " u n d e r 1 3 y e a r s o f age" u n d e r ORS 167.054. While we may from time to time suggest to a youthful customer t h a t a desired purchase m a y be inappropriate, it would b e difficult, i f not impossible, to "card" o r determine whether a child is under 13 years o f age a t o u r bookstores. Under ORS 167.057, furnishing a 17 year-old minor with such material is a crime i f furnished f o r t h e purpose o f satisfying the sexual desire o f the 17-year old. As discussed above, Powell's sells books and o t h e r materials containing sexually-related content that may be sexually arousing, depending on the individual. Under this section, Powell's would be committing a felony i f a 17 year-old purchased a book to satisfy his o r h e r sexual desire o r to become sexually aroused while reading such a book -- an act that individual has a r i g h t t o do.
Powell's has in stock o v e r two million volumes constituting o v e r one million
titles. W e receive on an average o v e r 5,000 new titles p e r week. Obviously w e cannot
read each new title to determine w h e t h e r there are any sexual explicit portions and if so whether such portions "serve some purpose o t h e r than titillation" (even i f I knew what t h a t meant). On Exhibit A are listed a f e w examples o f the multitude o f books, magazines o r o t h e r material sold a t Powell's likely t o contain sexually-related narrative o r pictorial content, including, in s o m e instances, nudity, that could be considered by s o m e " s e x u a l l y e x p l i c i t " o r "visual r e p r e s e n t a t i o n [ s ] o r e x p l i c i t v e r b a l d e s c r i p t i o n [ s ] o r n a r r a t i v e a c c o u n t [ s ] o f sexual c o n d u c t " t h a t m a y a p p e a l t o a p e r s o n ' s "sexual d e s i r e s . " believe t h e o n l y w a y f o r P o w e l l ' s t o e n s u r e c o m p l i a n c e u n d e r t h e A c t a t o u r stores would be to eliminate those materials entirely. Developing an alternative segregated s h e l v i n g a r r a n g e m e n t a t o u r s t o r e s f o r b o o k s t h a t m a y b e c o v e r e d u n d e r t h e A c t -- i f m y s t a f f and I could even determine that book by book, which I believe we could not without being extremely overinclusive - is totally impractical, unduly burdensome and would consume an inordinate amount o f time that w e d o not have. I f forced to d o so, we would have t o cover up o r rope o f f m a n y sections in m y stores to insure that minors would not have access. This would be extremely inconvenient t o customers, would completely alter the ambience o f the stores, and undoubtedly would have an adverse effect on sales. 9. In short, i f the Statute is n o t enjoined and Powell's must self-censor books,
it will lose the profits from the sale o f those books, and lose even more business because it will a p p e a r that the bookstore has an incomplete o r inadequate listing o f books in o u r inventory. A s importantly, adults and older teenagers will be impeded from access to constitutionally-protected materials.
Conclusion 10. For all the reasons stated above, I fear prosecution under the Statute. I f
the Statute is not enjoined, Powell's will be forced either t o self-censor o u r books and magazines t o a great degree o r risk criminal liability. (The only reason we have not selfcensored to date is that we have been advised that the Act is. unconstitutional.)
Date: A p r i l / y , , ' 2 0 0 B
~o7w-&::'-;(, !' ~-
Exhibit A Maya Angelou, I K n o w W h y the C a g e d B i r d S i n g s Steinbeck, O f M i c e a n d M e n Romance novels, including those by Nan Ryan & Linda Howard G r a p h i c novels, including t h o s e b y Laura C a r b o n i B o o k s o f P h o t o g r a p h y , i n c l u d i n g N u d e P h o t o g r a p h y : M a s t e r p i e c e s f r o m t h e p a s t 150 years Comfort, J o y o f S e x Blume, F o r e v e r S e x e d u c a t i o n b o o k s f o r teenagers, i n c l u d i n g C h a n g i n g B o d i e s . C h a n g i n g Lives, by Ruth Bell Nabokov, L o l i t a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?