Wheatstraw, LLC v. Mason et al

Filing 25

ORDER: I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation 23 as it applies to defendant Linda-Darnell Mason. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Wheatstraw's Motion for Attorney Fees 16 and Bill of Costs 19 are granted. I award attorney fees of $2,280.00 and costs of $20.00. Signed on 3/18/2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (See formal order, 2-pages) (ecp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON WHEATSTRAW LLC, an Oregon limited li abil it y company, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LINDA-DARNELL MASON, TAMMY ) DELANEY, MICHAEL EDWARD ) DELANEY, and all others, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) ) MICHAEL-EDWARD and ) TAMM IE- MARIE [Family: Delaney] ) ) Third Party Intervenors. ) ) Gary K. Kahn Tiffany A. Elkins Reeves, Kahn & Hennessy P. O. Box 86100 Portland, Oregon 97286 Attorneys for Plaintiff Page 1 - ORDER Civil Case No. 08-1176-HU ORDER Michael-Edward and Tammie-Marie P. O. Box 1804 Fairview, Oregon 97024 Pro Se KING, Judge: The Honorable Dennis J. Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 24, 2009. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#23), as it applies to defendant Linda-Darnell Mason. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Wheatstraw's Motion for Attorney Fees (#16) and Bill of Costs (#19) are granted. I award attorney fees of $2,280.00 and costs of $20.00. DATED this 18th day of March, 2009. /s/ Garr M. King GARR M. KING United States District Judge Page 2 - ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?