Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 14

Motion for Extension of Time. Filed by Matthew Robert Young. (pvh)

Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Doc. 14

FllED"09 MAY 071255usDC.l)<lp

I N T H E U N I T E D STATES p I S T R I C T C O U R T

F O R T H E STATE O F OREGON ) ) ) ) )
) )

,.
v.

Case No. OX-c\J -Jt..fjUJ -

BR

MOTION FOR EXTENSION

~Ti::b ~OR.~aeJ\n.oN $ I £\J £ tfoB>t-oo>o<........--

oN ,
_

OF TIME

) ) ) ) )

- F . R C . P . 6(b)--

-------------)

COMES NOW, t1ct\fu~

~, YQ}.{)9

, a p r i s o n e r n o t r e p r e s e n t e d b y counsel

and m o v e s this court for a n order granting a .. ..

4S d.a.y extension o f time whic.h. to file

~~ ~\)"t\ ()\~~\~ fuOO\M-S J
This due date would b e extended to the

the· ~

, 2~. This is r e q u e s t f o r an extension o f time. This motion is supported b y Dec.la f a , t \ 0 n

2 L day of ()(.J.O e
~, 2COG .

. D a t e d this ~ d a y of.....JML-..O.l::'a'-=lr

R e s p e c t i h l l y Submitted,

P a g e 1 o f I - M o t i o n for E x t e n s i o n o f T i m e

F o r m 39.080

Dockets.Justia.com

HLED'09 MAY 0712:5,.Cj/jSDc-oRP

DECLARATION

(ORCP Rule IE)
I, ~L.\

Ro'orl VOLMC(

~ do declare that:

UJ\~

: I OM. 8>\\\\ \(\ \J1SC\~\\Mt'f ;S~~tq(/l~OO.

-\\Y, ~

tD1t±S o~d.e\. X Q.tl ~<e 10

arJ

Can

f\O+

COrfl¥

\s \ \

e'+ 0

be Re Jea:cd F-teM

dv9-

t\v\\ C\[HCn ~oF f7Nrt±heW It. 'I~ 'V. D i d \X)cporcd1.on"\ (j..J Yleve fhb5, W5:e ~ Ol'-cJ-14 '11[11
C'arlS
Ol'de\11f\

(Ai\d ptodvle ~QClJclenJ- pJrodlO!) tcrp~b9 r.JJ-h .Jh e

%e

\illS~ OD ~\rA~~\-\'~ ~\~ett~e\\e\ ·k\.- ~e \~~\~~ Ck s:Y\~~~\~ - t t l . ~LLt. \'e 'M..<; 1 \ 0 1

~~r \\\5-V ~e~\<v~e ~~s\ \'i"Q\\oC\ \ 0 \ 8(,~J\.\\Of\ 0\- k\Me
WCN-l!L

"I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF M Y KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, A N D THAT I UNDERSTAND IT IS MADE FOR USE AS EVIDENCE IN COURT AND IS SUBJECT TO PENALTY FOR PERJURY."

Dated this

Ji-. day of ~

, 20aL.

~l-'~~·

1ii~~~~19~Page 1 o f 1 - D e c l a r a t i o n

Print Name:

Ma.JMew

R",---<;

1l..w...;~~ _ _

Form 04.015