Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 2

Complaint. Jury Trial Requested: Yes.Filed by Matthew Robert Young against Intel Corporation, Steve Jobs. (ecp)

Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Doc. 2

OKIGINAL

1

UNITED S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T FOR THE DISTRICT O F OREGON

M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG,

)
)

Plaintiff,

)
)

C i v i l . a : - 149 6 -

- BIL ~

v.
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendan~

)
)

DEMAND F O R J U R Y T R I A L R E Q U E S T EXTRODINARY HEARING

)
)

)
)

v.
S T E V E JOBS,

)
)

)
)

Third Party Defendant

)

C I V I L R I G H T S C O M P L A I N T B R O U G H T UNDER T I T L E 18 USC § 1028, T I T L E 15 USC § 1713 T I T L E 28 USC § 1338, § 1343, AND § 2201 C R E A T I N G A REMEDY F O R PROPERTY IN CONTROVERCY T I T L E 42 USC § 1983, § 1985, AND § 1986 F R C P R U L E B, C, D, AND E A C T I O N I N R E M , QUASI IN R E M , IN P E R S O N A M , A C T I O N I N P E R S O N A M CLAIMING VIOLATION O F INTELLECTUAL P R O P E R T Y I N F R I N G E M E N T O F A PATENTABLE INVENTION, AND C O P Y R I G H T A B L E W O R K , TRADE S E C E R T S AND UNFAIR C O M P E T I T I O N O F T H E C O M M E R C I A L L Y VALUABLE P R O D U C T P R O S E P L A I N T I F F S E E K S O R DEMANDS C O M P E N S A T I O N O F F I V E B I L L I O N DOLLARS [5,000,000,000.00] AND S E E K S A D E C L A R A T O R Y J U D G M E N T AND I N J U N C T I V E R E L I E F
MA'ITHEW ROBERT YOUNG PlaintitT i n p r o I e S I D No. 6242666 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

Dockets.Justia.com

2

1) Pro s e plaintiff, M a t t h e w Robert Young, is a State prisoner confined i n t h e Oregon D e p a r t m e n t o f C o r r e c t i o n s , S n a k e R i v e r C o r r e c t i o n a l I n s t i t u t i o n , l o c a t e d a t 777 S t a n t o n B l v d . , i n Ontario, O R 97914. Pro se p l a i n t i f f herein invokes his Constitutional Rights as a Citizen o f the U n i t e d S t a t e s o f A m e r i c a , t o b r i n g t h i s c i v i l a c t i o n , a c t i o n i n r e m , i n q u a s i r e m , i n p e r s o n a m , as a n a c t i o n i n p e r s o n a m a s a l l o w e d p u r s u a n t t o F R C P R u l e B , C , D , a n d E a n d f u r t h e r as p r o v i d e d b y Title 28 U S C § 2201 allowing for the creation o f a r e m e d y in a case o f an actual controversy o v e r personal property as provided b y and allowed u n d e r Title 28 U S C § 1338, i n the form o f personal intellectual p r o p e r t y t h a t i s a T r a d e Secret R i g h t o f a c o n u n e r c i a l l y v a l u a b l e p r o d u c t c r e a t e d from p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y d e s i g n o f a n a b s t r a c t p a t e n t a b l e , a n d c o p y r i g h t a b l e i n v e n t i o n and w o r k s . P r o s e p l a i n t i f f f u r t h e r c l a i m s t h a t t h e s e A c t s w e r e c o m m i t t e d in violation o f his c l e a r l y established F e d e r a l l y p r o t e c t e d Constitutional Rights Against lawful seizure o f his personal property, under the F o u r t h [4thl, and fourteenth [14tb ]

Amendments to the Constitution o f the United States. Pro se p l a i n t i f f seeks and demands Five Billion [$5,000,000,000.00) dollars compensation from Intel corporation for receiving o f his
s t o l e n p e r s o n a l property, t r a n s p o r t i n g o f h i s p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y i n t h e i n t e r s t a t e c o m m e r c e , the aiding i n actual concealing o f h i s personal property, a n d withholding o f stolen goods from t h e i r r i g h t f u l o w n e r , e v e n A F T E R I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n h a d b e e n m a d e a w a r e w i t h full k n o w l e d g e , t h a t p r o s e p l a i n t i f f is t h e r i g h t f u l o w n e r , a n d o r i g i n a l i n v e n t o r o f t h e s e c o m m e r c i a l l y v a l u a b l e products, Therefore pro se p l a i n t i f f prays that the United States District Court will Issue a J u d g m e n t A w a r d i n g p r o s e p l a i n t i f f t h e s u m d e m a n d e d above. P r o s e p l a i n t i f f n o t e s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f L e g a l f a c t u a l c o n t e n t i o n s t h a t t h e a c t o f r e c e i v i n g s t o l e n p r o p e r t y , as p r e s c r i b e d pursuant to the laws u n d e r 66 Am. J u r . 2 d o n receiving stolen property that i t is n o t necessary

MATIHEW ROBERT YOUNG P l a i n t i f f In p r o se S I D No. 6242666 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

3
t h a t I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n b e i n m a n u a l p o s s e s s i o n o r touching o f the s t o l e n goods, t h a t a n y exercising o f control o r dominion over them is sufficient to constitute a receiving. F o r this cause p r o se p l a i n t i f f c l a i m s u n f a i r competition, theft o f personal p r o p e r t y , c o n c e a l m e n t o f personal p r o p e r t y , fraud, a n d m o n o p o l y , a n d u n f a i r t r a d e p r a c t i c e . F o r t h i s p u r p o s e p r o s e p l a i n t i f f f u r t h e r s e e k s a n d p r a y s f o r i n j u n c t i v e r e l i e f , i n t h e form o f a U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t , r e s t r a i n i n g I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , a n d a n y o f its s u b s i d i a r i e s , associates, o r B u s i n e s s p a r t n e r s from seeking, m a k i n g d e v e l o p i n g o r i n a n y w a y d i s t r i b u t i n g for p r o f i t o r o t h e r w i s e p u b l i c u s e , a n y t e c h n o l o g i c a l c o m p u t e r i z e d device, a p p l i c a t i o n , tool, o r c o m m e r c i a l i z e p r o d u c t t h a t i n c o r p o r a t e s o r uses i n a n y w a y t h e [ C o r e - 2 D u o V i r t u a l i z e d Technology].

2) Pro se p l a i n t i f f request pursuant to F R C P R u l e 54 for Judgment o f All Costs, and
Court filing fees, attorney's fees, and all other c o s t a n d distributions that m a y incur herein. 3) This Civil Action is brought i n the United States District Court located at:

United States D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e D i s t r i c t o f O r e g o n M a r k O . H a t f i e l d U.S. C o u r t h o u s e , 1000 S.W. T h i r d A v e n u e P o r t l a n d , O R 97204
a) This United States District Court has Jurisdiction to hear and decide these matters a n d issues i n controversy and to award pro se p l a i n t i f f the amount and s u m sought herein pursuant to

T i t l e 28 U.S.C. § 1332, § 1337, §1338, §1343, § 2201, § 2202 and T i t l e 42 U.S.C § 1983, § 1985, and further under T i t l e U.S.C. § 1986. Pro se p l a i n t i f f reserves t h e right to amend this
j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n t t o T i t l e 2 8 U S C § 1653. b ) Pro s e p l a i n t i f f M a t t h e w R o b e r t Y o u n g i s [ a c i t i z e n o f Oregon]. T h e d e f e n d a n t I n t e l

C o r p o r a t i o n s i s [ a c i t i z e n o f Oregon] [ a c o r p o r a t i o n i n c o r p o r a t e d u n d e r t h e L a w s o f O r e g o n ,
w i t h its p r i n c i p l e p l a c e o f b u s i n e s s i n Oregon]. T h e a m o u n t i n c o n t r o v e r s y i s F i v e B i l l i o n
MATIHEW ROBERT YOUNG P l a i n t i f f i n p r o se S I D No. 6 2 4 2 6 6 6 777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

4

Dollars [$ 5,000,000,000.00] without interest and costs which exceeds the s u m o r value
specified b y Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332,

c) Steve J o b s is a [citizen o f California] and here after the filing o f this complaint, w i l l b e
omitted as a party, until such time as Intel corporation moves to include him as a third p a r t y defendant, enjoining pro s e p l a i n t i f f in a cause raising the claim o f Fraud, and material misrepresentation w i t h respect to information n o t included i n the statement o f property purchased o r received form Mr. Steve Jobs.

d) The third p a r t y defendant Steve Jobs will hereafter b e omitted as a party, in that at this
time M r . J o b s [is not subject to this C o u r t ' s jurisdiction] and therefore cannot b e m a d e a party, w i t h o u t d e p r i v i n g t h i s C o u r t o f s u b j e c t m a t t e r j u r i s d i c t i o n i n t h i s c a u s e o f action, B e c a u s e t o t h e b e s t o f p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s k n o w l e d g e , M r . J o b s w a s [ a r e s i d e n t o f t h e state o f California] w h e n h e d e f r a u d e d I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , about where, a n d f r o m w h o m h e a c t u a l l y a c q u i r e d t h e D e s i g n s , and Schematics from, w h i c h Intel Corporation actually t h e n developed the [Core-2 Duo,

Virtual Technology], from.
e) Therefore it is I n t e l Corporation's position to enjoin p r o s e p l a i n t i f f i n a separate

action against Steve Jobs, unless this court allows I n t e l Corporation to do so in this civil action, p u r s u a n t to L R (Local R u l e s ) 14 (a) - (a), Holding that a defending party, may as a t h i r d p a r t y plaintiff, cause to b e s e r v e d with Summons a n d Complaint, a p e r s o n who is not a party, (which h e r e a f t e r S t e v e Jobs, w i l l b e o m i t t e d as a Party) as a person liable f o r the p l a i n t i f f claims against the defendingparty. F R C P 1 4 (a).

PLAINTIFF
4 ) M a t t h e w R o b e r t Young i s t h e p l a i n t i f f p r o c e e d i n g i n p r o s e , i n t h i s c i v i l a c t i o n , D a t e
M A T T H E W ROBERT Y O U N G

Plaintiff In p r o se

SID No. 6242666
777 Stanton Blvd Ontario, O R 97914

5
o f b i r t h J u l y 4 1965, place o f b i r t h Albuquerque, New Mexico. Pro s e p l a i n t i f f is currently
b e i n g u n l a w f u l l y h e l d a n d r e s t r a i n e d o f h i s l i b e r t y a n d freedom i n t h e S n a k e R i v e r Correctional Institution, which is located at 777 Stanton Blvd., Ontario, O R 97914, which subject matter is currently b e i n g brought o n a separate civil action i n this United States District C o u r t , Civil No. 08-1138-PK.
th

DEFENDANTS
5) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n i s t h e l i a b l e D e f e n d a n t i n t h i s c i v i l a c t i o n , a n d i s a C o r p o r a t i o n w i t h i n t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f t h i s U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t , a n d for t h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s civil a c t i o n t o b e h e l d l i a b l e o f t h e l a w s c i t e d a n d r a i s e d h e r e . I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n is c o n s i d e r e d a c i t i z e n f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f t h i s c i v i l a c t i o n , a n d m a d e s u b j e c t t o l i a b i l i t y p u r s u a n t t o T i t l e 2 8 USC §1332©(1), a n d Title 42 USC §1985, § 1986, and is located at 2111 N.E. 25 th Ave., Hillsboro,

O R 97124.
6) Steve J o b s is the third p a r t y defendant, and i s i n fact liable to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , he is L o c a t e d i n California.

QUESTIONS O F T H E C H A R A C T E R O F T H E CLAIMS AND ADDMISSIBILITY O F T H E NATURE AND W E I G H T O F SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
7) Pro se p l a i n t i f f intends to bring into focus the central characteristics o f p r o se p l a i n t i f f ' s claims as t h e y are supported b y such evidence that w h e n viewed u n d e r the Uniform A d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e L a w s o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , d o e s t a b l i s h t h e m s e l v e s as f a c t u a l c o n t e n t i o n s , a n d further brings them within the scope o f these applicable Laws, as to the sufficiency o f the substance o f their subject matter, as the required elements needed to establish h i s compliant as an appropriate pleading within the scope, and Design o f Title 2 8 USC § 2201, providing that a n y c o u r t o f t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s , u p o n t h e filing o f a n a p p r o p r i a t e p l e a d i n g m a y d e c l a r e t h e r i g h t s o f
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG P l a i n t i f f in p r o l i e S I D No. 6242666 777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

6 t h e p a r t i e s a n d o t h e r l e g a l r e l a t i o n s o f a n y i n t e r e s t e d p a r t y s e e k i n g s u c h declaration. a) Pro se p l a i n t i f f s factual contentions are such that, at an evidentiary hearing pro se plaintiff will prove that there exist absolutely no opposing genuine issues o f any material facts to e v e n r e m o t e l y c h a l l e n g e the t r u t h f u l n e s s o f t h e i r p r o b a t i v e value. b ) P r o s e p l a i n t i f f m a k e t h i s declaration: [ T H A T ] , I f a n y o n e i n t h e w o r l d today c a n

c o m e b e f o r e t h i s Court, a t a n e v i d e n t i a r y h e a r i n g , a n d p r e s e n t t o t h i s C o u r t a c r e d i t a b l e c h a l l e n g e , ( w h i c h w o u l d b e d u r i n g an E v i d e n t i a r y H e a r i n g H e l d B e f o r e t h i s C o u r t , w h e r e i n A l l o f t h e parties a r e p r o v i d e d t i m e c h a n c e a n d t h e opportunity to p r e s e n t to t h i s court t h e a c t u a l applications f o r these commercially valuable products), which are known as the [ C o r e - 2
D u o M i c r o P r o c e s s o r , a n d V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] , allegedly i n v e n t e d b y I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , then pro se p l a i n t i f f agrees to b e H E L D liable for the T e n T h o u s a n d D o l l a r [$10,000.00] civil fine fees. B u t f i r s t here is pro se p l a i n t i f f s standing upon factual contention as required in part b y F R C P R u l e 11, which pertains to [the proprietary information, t h e a c t u a l trade secrets] o f the t r u e a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e [ C o r e - 2 D u o m i c r o p r o c e s s o r , a n d V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] , o f w h i c h I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n only knows the potential Applications o f t h e s e Technology products, as I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n w a s p r o v i d e d b y M r . S t e v e J o b s , a n d n o t i t t r u e T e c h n o l o g i c a l Trade S e c r e t

Designs that will make these commercially valuable Technology products work, and p e r f o n n to
their fullest ability, and capacities. c) Pro se plaintiff is the o n l y person i n the world at present who knows how to make b o t h t h e [ C o r e - 2 D u o m i c r o p r o c e s s o r , a n d t h e V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] w o r k , a n d p r o se p l a i n t i f f c a n i n fact c o m e b e f o r e t h i s U S D i s t r i c t C o u r t a n d p r o v e i t b y a factual D E M O N S T R A T I O N . 8) Pro se p l a i n t i f f further brings this civil action under the federal jurisdiction o f this U S

M A T I H E W ROBERT YOUNG Plaintiff in pro Ie S I D No. 6242666 777 Stanton Blvd O n t a r i o . O R 97914

7 D i s t r i c t C o u r t p u r s u a n t to t h e F e d e r a l R u l e s o f E v i d e n c e R u l e s 1 0 4 ( a ) ( b ) & ( e ) , R u l e s 1 0 6 , 201 (b) o n k i n d s o f facts, (d) w h e n m a n d a t o r y (e) o p p o r t u n i t y t o b e h e a r d a n d ( I ) t i m e f o r t a k i n g n o t i c e ; R u l e 3 0 1 , 3 0 2 , 401, 402 a n d 404 F R C P R u l e s B , C , D a n d E . a ) I t i s p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s i n t e n t t o f u r t h e r b r i n g i n t o focus h e r e , t h e c e n t r a l i d e a l o f t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f p r o s e p l a i n t i f f a r g u m e n t s u b s t a n t i a t i n g h i s c l a i m s , as t h e y a r e s u p p o r t e d b y s u c h e v i d e n c e t h a t u n d e r t h e u n i f o n n a d m i n i s t r a t i o n o f t h e L a w s g o v e r n i n g , d o e s t a b l i s h h i s c l a i m s as factual contentions that are the subject matter, o f t h e type o f substance that is required in order to e s t a b l i s h t h i s c o m p l a i n t as a n a p p r o p r i a t e p l e a d i n g t h a t d e c l a r e t h e R i g h t s u n d e r t h e L a w s t h a t mandates other legal relations .. b ) P r o s e p l a i n t i f f d e c l a r e s h e r e t h a t t h i s a c t i o n i s a J U S T cause, a n d n o t for h a r a s s m e n t p u r p o s e s , f u r t h e r P r o s e p l a i n t i f f m a k e s i n h i s d e c l a r a t i o n a r e q u e s t for t h i s U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t Court to H O L D a simple exemplary test under seal o f this court, for this Court have pro s e p l a i n t i f f brought before I t to give a Demonstration for this C o u r t i n person, exactly j u s t h o w the c o m p u t e r [ T e c h n o l o g y w h i c h I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n c a l l s V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y the M i c r o P r o c e s s o r w h i c h I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n c a l l s c o r e 2 - DUO}, w o r k s a n d t o s e a l t h i s p r o p r i e t a r y

i n f o r m a t i o n which pro se p l a i n t i f f will Demonstrate for this Court, to b e products that were i n
fact D e v e l o p e d , M a n u f a c t u r e d , a n d B u i l t f r o m p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s p e r s o n a l i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y t o which O N L Y pro se p l a i n t i f f s Holds the F U L L Knowledge o f the [proprietary i n f o r m a t i o n

t r a d e secret.]
c) p r o s e p l a i n t i f f , f u r t h e r r e q u e s t t h a t t h i s U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t O r d e r t h a t I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n b r i n g i n i t ' s b e s t and b r i g h t e s t engineers, B e f o r e t h i s C o u r t u n d e r t h e s a m e s e a l e d Hearing conditions as pro se p l a i n t i f f is Brought, and have anyone o f them, or anyone in the
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG P l a I n t i f f In p r o se SID No. U42666 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

8

world, who I n t e l c o r p o r a t i o n can find who can Demonstrate for this District Court, the Actual
Application o f how the [ V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y o r C o r e 2 - DUO] actually works, i f they (can) then as stated above, under the federal laws governing civil actions pro se p l a i n t i f f (shall be), i f h e fails to Demonstrate his trade secret, be held liable to the defendant(s) for T e n T h o u s a n d D o l l a r s [$10,000.00] a n d t o t h i s r e q u i r e m e n t p r o s e p l a i n t i f f i s t w o h u n d r e d p e r c e n t ( 2 0 0 % ) i n agreement with this. H O W E V E R when I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n F A I L S to give a Demonstration, pro se p l a i n t i f f D E M A N D S j u s t compensation o f F i v e Billion d o l l a r s [$5,000,000,000.00] and any and all Patents, copyrights, Trademarks, Monies, Money Contrasts, Transactions, Records

a n d all Documentation, Agreements, Trades, Stocks, Bonds, a n d a n y other business c o n d u c t e d o r e n g a g e d i n c o n c e r n i n g t h e [ C o r e 2 - D U O , a n d V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] and A L L
M O N E Y P R O F I T S m a d e r e c e i v e d a n d p r o f i t e d t h e r e form, o n c e p r o s e p l a i n t i f f d e m o n s t r a t e s for this United States District Court the fact o f his Ownership as the Original Inventor o f these Technological c o m m e r c i a l l y v a l u a b l e products. QUESTIONS OF LIBALITY 9) I n assessing the question o f liability pro se p l a i n t i f f first turns to the supreme law o f the L O R D G O D O F H O S T , because these are i n fact the v e r y same Laws upon which this Land o f America, and the United States was founded u p o n and herein will further serve to clarify w h e n a person is liable for their actions, and further establishes When they do wrong without m o w i n g it and when they Knowingly do w r o n g and continues to do so with little regard for the fact that the A c t o r Acts o f the wrongful conduct violates the Laws governing them [Note: This

is n o t a legal argument] b u t rather it is pro s e p l a i n t i f f s intent to bring into focus grounds upon
w h i c h r e l i e f m a y b e Granted, a n d M o n e t a r y D a m a g e s A w a r d e d , i n t h a t t h i s i s an e x t r a o r d i n a r y

MATTHEW ROBERT YOUNG P l a i n t i f f i n p r o 8e S I D N o . 6242666 777 Stanton Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

9 civil action created as allowed pursuant to T i t l e 28 U S C § 2201. a) I n R o m a n s Ch. 3, v. 19 & 20 THE L O R D G O D O F H O S T Declares

v. 19 Now we k n o w that what things so ever t h e law
saith, i t saith to them to them who are u n d e r t h e law: t h a t every m o u t h m a y b e s t o p p e d a n d a l l t h e world m a y become guilty before God.

v. 2 0 Therefore b y t h e deeds o f t h e law there s h a l l n o f l e s h b e j u s t i f i e d i n H i s sight: f o r b y t h e l a w i s t h e knowledge o f sin.
b) So i t follows that liability is upon to those who are u n d e r the L a w and w h o have

knowledge o f it.
c) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n is liable to pro se p l a i n t i f f because as a citizens o f t h e United States, resident c i t i z e n s o f t h e S t a t e o f Oregon, I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n o p e r a t e s a n d c o n d u c t i t ' s B u s i n e s s T r a n s a c t i o n s a n d affairs u n d e r t h e L a w s e n a c t e d b y t h e H o u s e o f C o n g r e s s o f t h e U n i t e d States, t h e C o n s t i t u t i o n o f t h e S t a t e o f O r e g o n , and t h e O r e g o n A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R u l e s , a n d S t a t u t o r y Laws o f t h e State o f O r e g o n d ) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , i n o r d e r to b e i n c o r p o r a t e d , a n d t o o p e r a t e a n d c o n d u c t a n y B u s i n e s s T r a n s a c t i o n o r A f f a i r s m u s t f i r s t b e L i c e n s e d , a n d I n s u r e d t o d o so, w i t h K n o w l e d g e and u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e L a w s g o v e r n i n g C o r p o r a t i o n s and t h e i r Liabilities. e) Pro s e p l a i n t i f f has i n fact communicated and established h i m s e l f to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n as t h e r i g h t f u l o w n e r a n d t h e o r i g i n a l c r e a t o r , i n v e n t o r o f t h e [ C o r e - 2 D u o M i c r o P r o c e s s o r } , a n d [ V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] t h a t I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n h a s i n fact b e e n m a r k e t i n g a n d s e l l i n g f o r m o n e t a r y financial p r o f i t o n t h e c o m m e r c e and t r a d e i n t e r s t a t e c o m m e r c i a l w o r l d m a r k e t , w i t h full k n o w l e d g e a n d u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h a t t h e t e c h n o l o g i c a l p r o d u c t s , m e r c h a n d i s e g o o d s , o r p r o p e r t y i n c o n t r o v e r s y d o e s i n f a c t b e l o n g to p r o s e p l a i n t i f f , w i t h o u t p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG P l a i n t i f f In p r o se

SID No. 6241666
777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

10 permission, authorization or consent to do so, and without ever once paying pro se plaintiff any monies, and o r sharing any o f the profits with pro se plaintiff, o r offering pro se plaintiff any form o f j u s t C o m p e n s a t i o n S t o c k s , B o n d s , S h a r e s , e t c . S T A T E M E N T S O F C L A I M S CAUSE O F A C T I O N CLAIM I 1 0 ) I n M a r c h o r A p r i l o f 2 0 0 3 , p r o se p l a i n t i f f , s e n t a c o p y o f t h e D e s i g n s a n d Schematics, o f his intellectual property, a patentable invention, and copyrightable work, to wit; a

H a c k e r p r o o f , V i r u s p r o o f C o m p u t e r , w i t h M u l t i p h a s e M i c r o p r o c e s s o r s , w h i c h p r o se p l a i n t i f f
calls [ L A N C E L O T ] , for it impervious ability to being Hacked into and its ability to fight o f f Viruses, to Steve J o b s , at A p p l e C o m p u t e r , in California, but did not send M r . J o b s , the

proprietary information, which is the Trade Secret. See Attached Exhibits Marked P R O S E P L .

EX. ----:\_ _
a) Pro se plaintiff requested that M r . J o b s , Help and Assistance him i n developing and M a r k e t i n g , h i s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e i n v e n t i o n , o r b u y i t from p r o s e p l a i n t i f f f o r T w o H u n d r e d a n d F i f t y Million D o l l a r s [$ 250,000,000.001, and that upon receiving a contractual signed agreement, then pro se plaintiff would agree to sent to M r . J o b s , the Proprietary

Information, the Trade Secrets on how to make this computer Technology work.
b ) S t e v e J o b s , n e v e r r e p l i e d t o pro se p l a i n t i f f . CLAIM II 11) I n the latter part o f that same year, 2003, Steve J o b s , took pro se plaintiff's

i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e inventions, t o I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n . T h e e x a c t n a t u r e a n d e x t e n t o f
the Agreement between M r . J o b s , and I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n is n o t known to pro se plaintiff at this
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG P l a i n t i f f In p r o I e

SID No. 6242666
777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

11

time. a) I t remains however a fact that M r . Steve J o b s , D e f r a u d e d I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , b y not totally Disclosing to, and Informing I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n j u s t where exactly he got it, and from whom he actually did get the D e s i g n s and S c h e m a t i c s for the D u a l - C o r e l Core-2 D u o M i c r o p r o c e s s o r , and V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y . CLAIM III 12) In J u n e o f 2006, I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n ' s senior vice president M r . P a t Gelsinger, is seen being photographed in the Oregonian News Paper, Holding i n his left hand, a computer mother board, which I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n later termed V i r t u a l Technology. With the help o f E M C Corporation's V M w a r e Inc. unit, who I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n paid T w o H u n d r e d Eighteen Million Dollars,[$ 218,000,000.00] to H E L P I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , to t r y figure out pro se p l a i n t i f f s proprietary information, Trade Secrets, See Attached Exhibit Marked P R O SE P L .

a) Pro se plaintiff can in fact come Before this U S District Court, and prove conclusively that the computer mother board, which M r . Gelsinger, is holding in his hand, i n the News Paper is in fact a product created and manufactured from pro se p l a i n t i f f s intellectual property
Design, patentable invention, o f [ L A N C E L O T ] the H a c k e r p r o o f , Virus P r o o f computer. See

\ Attached E x h i b i t s M a r k e d P R O S E P L . E X . - - - ' ' - - b ) I n t e l c o r p o r a t i o n has publicly Announced that I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n rolled out the first dual-core microprocessor in the latter part o f 2 0 0 5 , and in that same Public Announcement, stated that I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n is seeking H E L P from universities and programmers, to H E L P I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n [SOLVE t h e m u l t i t h r e a d i n g ] problems that Intel cooks up. See Attached
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG Plaintiff In p r o I e S I D No. 6 2 4 2 6 6 6 777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

12 Exhibit Marked P R O S E P L . E X .

3 . This is in fact an explicit P L E A from Intel

C o r p o r a t i o n albeit a n implicit P L E A b y I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n for a n y o n e to H E L P I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n t r y to figure out how to make this Technology work. CLAIM IV 1 3 ) a f t e r l e a r n i n g that t h a t c o m p u t e r m i c r o c h i p s G r o s s e d o v e r T w o H u n d r e d a n d F o r t y Six Billion D o l l a r s [$ 246,000,000,000.00] world wide i n 2006, pro se plaintiff I n F e b r u a r y 2007, sent to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n a letter o f acknowledgment and ownership o f the [Core-2 D u o P r o c e s s o r and V i r t u a l Technology], in which pro se plaintiff made certain demands, and placing certain restrictions, and obligations on any Letters, Response, Reply, Communiques, o r interacting Missives, to which I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n did i n fact, in large part complied with, which i n turn was a n Act b y I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n establishing that I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n ' s does in fact Acknowledge that pro se plaintiff is the Rightful owner of, and original inventor and creator o f the [ D u a l c o r e / C o r e - 2 D u o M i c r o p r o c e s s o r , a n d t h e V i r t u a l Technology]. a) I n his Communique to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , Pro se plaintiff addressed I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n in this manner; Dear I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n ; Does this look familiar? Well it should. It is the H a c k e r P r o o f , V i r u s P r o o f Computer, t h a t I i n v e n t e d , w h i c h I Call [ L A N C E L O T ] . I showed it to Steve J o b s , at A p p l e C o m p u t e r , and asked him for T w o H u n d r e d and Fifty Million Dollars, he took it to you at I n t e l , and you built i t b u t you do not know how to turn i t on. So here is what you are going to do. You are going to Agree to p a y m e Seventy P e r c e n t (70 % ) every thing that You Gross O f f o f it, and then I will tell you how to turn I t on and make it do what I Designed it to do.
M A T T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG P h d n t i f f i n p r o se S I D No. 6242666 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

13 You have 3 0 d a y s to R e s p o n d , o n B o n d e d p a p e r , with y o u r Signature written in B l u e i n k , or I am going to send copies O f m y schematics t o A M D ( A d v a n c e M i c r o Devices) and T e l l t h e m h o w i t w o r k s f o r n e x t t o nothing. b ) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n r e s p o n d e d e x a c t l y i n t h e m a n n e r D E M A N D E D b y p r o se p l a i n t i f f , m e e t i n g t h e r e q u i r e d c o n d i t i o n s , a n d o b l i g a t i o n s p l a c e d o n the R e s p o n s e b y p r o se plaintiff, S e e Attached Exhibit Marked P R O S E P L . EX. ----"4_ _ c) P r o se plaintiff request that this U. S. District Court p a y special Attention to the fact t h e e v e n t h o u g h , I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n d i d n o t agree t o p a y pro s e p l a i n t i f f S e v e n t y P e r c e n t ( 7 0 % ) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n Never once Denied nor even tried to Challenge pro se p l a i n t i f f s position as t h e R i g h t f u l O w n e r , a n d O r i g i n a l C r e a t o r , and I n v e n t o r o f t h e D u a l ~ C o r e M i c r o p r o c e s s o r , and t h e C o m p u t e r m o t h e r b o a r d , l a t t e r call V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y , s e e n b e i n g H e l d i n the h a n d o f I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n ' s senior v i c e president M r . P a t G e l s i n g e r . See Attached Exhibit M a r k e d P R O SE P L .
EX.~.

4.+7

d ) W h e n I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n r e p l i e d w i t h i n T w o and o n e h a l f w e e k s , i n t h e m a n n e r D E M A N D E D b y pro s e plaintiff, pro se plaintifT, wrote to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n a second time, and i n this Communique pro se p l a i n t i f f did not address I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n so harshly, and made I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , w h a t pro se p l a i n t i f f believed to b e alair proposition, which was stated to this effect; Dear I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n : Thank you for responding i n the Manner that I requested, A n d s i n c e y o u d i d i t m a y n o t h a v e b e e n y o u r fault a n d t h a t y o u m a y n o t have known that Steve J o b s lied to you, so here is m y Offer to you, Sign a Contractual Agreement with m e where I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n w i l l agree t o p a y m e F i f t e e n P e r c e n t ( 1 5 % ) O f e v e r y t h i n g t h a t you m a k e o n m y H a c k e r P r o o f , a n d V i r u s P r o o f C o m p u t e r [ L A N C E L O T ] , a n d also s i g n a C o n t r a c t u a l
M A ' I T H E W R O B E R T YOUNG PlalntitT In p r o I e

SID No. 6242666
777 S t a n t o n Blvd O n t a r i o , O R 97914

14
Agreement to manufacture build, a n d Market f o r me, m y Computer Chip Microprocessor,[TRAD WA Y]. Please note that the S A M E Conditions apply here, 3 0 days, with Y o u r s i g n a t u r e i n B l u e i n k o n B o n d e d paper.

e) I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n Responded j u s t as pro se p l a i n t i f f Requested, within T h r e e (3) weeks, o n B o n d e d p a p e r , with the S i g n a t u r e i n B l u e i n k . See Attached Exhibit Marked P R O S E P L . EX.

5

1) Again pro se p l a i n t i f f Request that this U.S. District Court p a y special attention to the

fact that A G A I N I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n did not Challenge o r Deny that pro se plaintiff is the Rightful o w n e r o f this Technology. CLAIM V a) According to various News Paper Publications, I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n has Made over F i f t y Billion D o l l a r s [$ 50,000,000,000.00] profit o f f o f pro se p l a i n t i f f s intellectual property patentable invention, which I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n calls [Core 2, D u o Processor] alone, and pro se p l a i n t i f f c a n n o t e v e n guess h o w m u c h I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n h a s m a d e o f f o f p r o s e p l a i n t i f f s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e invention, w h i c h I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n c a l l s [ V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y ] b ) B u t H E R E I S A F A C T U A L C O N T E N T I O N , AND I S S U E A T L A W , A T C O M M O N L A W , I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n would N O T H A V E this Money, Profits, Stocks, Bonds, and position as the Main supplier, and p r i n c i p a l p r o v i d e r o f the Worlds Computer Microchips, H A D S t e v e J o b s N O T p r o v i d e d I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n , a c o p y o f p r o se p l a i n t i f f s I n t e l l e c t u a l Property Designs, and Schematics from which I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n then manufactured the Dual Core M u l t i p h a s e M i c r o c h i p P r o c e s s o r . c) Even after pro se p l a i n t i f f has C O N C L U S I V E L Y P R O V E N to I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n
M A T I H E W R O B E R T YOUNG Plaintiff In p r o se SID No. 6242666 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

15 that he is i n fact the Rightful Owner, and the Original Inventor o f this Technology, I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n continues to violate pro se p l a i n t i f f s Constitutional, and Common Law Rights to enjoy the Fruits o f his labor, I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n in its unfair trade practice, continues even after b e c o m i n g a w a r e t h a t p r o s e p l a i n t i f f i s t h e r i g h t f u l o w n e r , and o r i g i n a l i n v e n t o r o f t h i s technology, k n o w i n g l y conceal, withhold, t r a n s f e r i n i n t e r s t a t e commerce, sell o n t h e w o r l d commercial market for the sole purpose o f illegally profiting from pro se p l a i n t i f f s personal i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e i n v e n t i o n s , and c o p y r i g h t a b l e w o r k s w i t h o u t p r o s e p l a i n t i f f ' s approval, authorization, c o n s e n t , a n d a g a i n s t p r o se p l a i n t i f f s w a n t s a n d desires, w i t h o u t b e i n g

Grateful o r showing any consideration to the fact that had i t not been for pro se plaintiff's i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r l y p a t e n t a b l e i n v e n t i o n designs a n d s c h e m a t i c s , I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n w o u l d N O T b e t h e World l e a d e r i n c o m p u t e r m i c r o c h i p s T o d a y , A M D ( A d v a n c e d M i c r o D e v i c e s ) , o r
M i c r o n T e c h n o l o g y could have j u s t as easily have been the World Leader i n manufacturing c o m p u t e r m i c r o c h i p p r o c e s s o r s w i t h p r o se p l a i n t i f f ' s i n t e l l e c t u a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e inventions. S e e Attached Exhibit M a r k e d P R O S E P L . E X .

1 +I 0

RELIEF SOUGHT THERFORE Pursuant to the United States Code Amendments cited above i n this civil

action, with emphasis at T i t l e 28 U S C § 1343 (a) (1) (2) (3), and (4), § 1338, and § 2201; This United States District Court has the Authority and needed Jurisdiction to Render Judgments, and Issue Orders directed at and to the parties here i n this civil action, and to O R D E R that an Extraordinary Hearing b e Held, and Conducted wherein the parties must perform under seal r e c o r d o f this U S D i s t r i c t C o u r t a D e m o n s t r a t i o n o f t h e Actual T r a d e Secrets t h e P r o p r i e t a r y Information pertaining to t h e C o m m e r c i a l l y V a l u a b l e Products c a l l e d D u a l C o r e , C o r e 2 D u o

M A T T H E W ROBERT YOUNG

Plaintiff In p r o I e
SID No. 6242666 7 7 7 Stanton B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

16 Micro Processor, a n d the Computer Technology called V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y . M A T T H E W R O B E R T Y O U N G , T h e Clamant P l a i n t i f f proceeding i n p r o se, D E M A N D S J u s t C o m p e n s a t i o n A w a r d s i n t h e S u m and A m o u n t o f F i v e B i l l i o n D o l l a r s ,

[$ 5,000,000,000.00] for the unauthorized use and profits m a d e from p r o s e p l a i n t i f f ' s
intellectual p e r s o n a l p r o p e r t y p a t e n t a b l e invention, a n d c o p y r i g h t a b l e works. Pro se p l a i n t i f f further DEMANDS Compensatory Awards o f A L L o f the Patents, Copyrights, T r a d e m a r k s , P r o c e e d s M o n i e s , S t o c k s , B o n d s , Securities, and Contracts, Agreements, and any and ALL Business DEALS m a d e generated and o r agreed to i n regards to t h e C o m m e r c i a l l y V a l u a b l e P r o d u c t s c a l l e d C o r e 2 Duo, a n d V i r t u a l T e c h n o l o g y . P r o s e p l a i n t i f f R e q u e s t t h a t t h i s U n i t e d States C o u r t Issue a n d I n j u n c t i o n p r o h i b i t i n g I n t e l C o r p o r a t i o n its s u b s i d i a r i e s ' , B u s i n e s s p a r t n e r s , A s s o c i a t e s , a n d o r a n y p e r s o n o r C i t i z e n w i t h i n this C o u r t s J u r i s d i c t i o n to O r d e r W o r l d w i d e f r o m m a n u f a c t u r i n g , b u i l d i n g , m a r k e t i n g , s e l l i n g o r o t h e r w i s e p e r t a i n i n g to t h e T e c h n o l o g y s t a t e d a n d m e n t i o n e d i n t h i s c i v i l a c t i o n . Executed o n t h i s 1 2 . . . d a y o f f ) f e

e d £ , lai3
~~MATTHEW }l61fERTYOUNG P r o se p l a i n t i f f

I d e c l a r e u n d e r t h e p e n a l t y o f p e r j u r y t h a t t h e f o r e g o i n g is t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t o f my knowledge. Signed a n d Dated this
II _

!.2 Day o f D « l "~ P I ·2.Lio .2
_.-

I~~ MATTHEW ~ RTYOUNG

A-J.J-.t'I

M A T I H E W R O B E R T YOUNG Plaintiff In p r o I e S I D No. 6 2 4 2 6 6 6 777 S t a n t o n B l v d O n t a r i o , O R 97914

- _ . _ - - ---. - - ' ,
:;t· ".' ~.:,:}.=:.~:.-?
..

- - '-

"'--'"

_._-

r------.·-- -

.~'

f.-.

~\
>-'-

,l:(\

\

~-- \
/"
'.

~f'.

. . V . . . . ...::I;

,t'···.

1

o

C Z

....
CD

~

_ _ _E ;
i

:rl
"

~-\. 't\\

I , .: . . '":

1li " ; . - .l1 ;1

: " : - 1 ; .:;, . ~.!}
I I I,,·
"'"~ i" ,
.~~.

ORIGINAL
P\\O ~E

·.

·. ·~;f'.· ..:·..II·uo;·.··l"\j.·.· r

Pl. ~. 2.

l!··i

L~~.;:.;:
';;~~;l
;':w" ~ ' . ,.I.

!~;_:.-;;:

· ·· .'.
,O · · · !

::':':I':I"'i.
1
.· , .·

t/lII!/;IlijIJ

~'iiN
m~

~

·

.

Bil }f.~l
~'l~' Ji;. !:..~;.
.. ..
~

.

I:

1:-

·1
-",
'-':"1,' 9.llfllIilI ~''f~'

,
.

.
A r.'·
I

~

.'~

~~m.':'::"j..L~

.tIl::.
_
·

,"

...

,..;' '~~'D""
;

o:.a"'flJo

~

.. ,.

'.' .<~:\!.;' <';':",~~-.:: ;...., .. /
'.,
",

' r ' ii, . \ ."
...
"
~.:.: ~

/I...tl
H

t;'

.~. ~
. ~-::_.-"" ~
1$ . . . . . .,

'f'

/l ' .
'"

", , : ~ .. ,. =::·=-~::";'-"-+fl
;:

...~.. ~
',"

,::~~:

I

i

'

. .~'*
,'

''0:._"
'C.

.........

\r.'J'.

..4_... _·.

')

.- "
.:..

T
I
;I

-'

.:>'

. .,;.::.>~~ ';:. f;·':-"·'1>:.'. ;';"i"~'1_"'J".. ~ i> · l .;:
·'

:"'

~'''~."I
J '"

......
,

·

.......

\

~ ' ; ~.

!'

'~ .
J

""".~ . . " ·.· ; " . \ . " "...... ,-,l.:"'~.,\\. " ' \ I I.·\~
,\'

·

·

\

. ' ~..
I

. ',)

",

~
· ·f ' .
,

01: " , l " " 1i l"i11' i!.:'IiI:li· j,

'.

, .; 1:f',~0'o ., . ' . r~;J~' ~\~ .. "'~'1~ \'" ." 1 1~h, v ' ; . ' 1 ' . ' J'li 1,. ~"
, ·.·..~,~. 'l,,:

"

·.

···.. ·:~~,.,\I,·'I~·
'
\I

"',~,:fl\.,
:'
d

,. I

.. . ..
~
, ,~

'" ·r·.... ' ·.. ' " 1 "" '>. '"I:'~'"

" : . . j.,;;;

.,.;(
.: ",~:,

~.. ,' " ~~'II~I \ " '1' r· . . ~ ~;" ; .,.~ .. ",( '\ i\:
> " , J "R,I.
,.

":·(,,:.\<I~"'rl~. I :~ I ~ i).1.0
'

H'I
l

..

~~
I~~

.

4,.-:- .'.\,.
/"

~", 'I

"I

"

.

:

~

: '" .

" " } · I .. I

.'.

i;~ r[~lI'.

'fwo-brain chip

Intel's dual-core processors have two digital engines on o n e . . . ' piece of silicon, enabling faster . " <:' . multiple-computing tasks.

I n teJ,. Wm re1 y
.1~~11

Chl·ps.· f~··:l
· .'

~.:' ~f:~~~;~
Slngl~~o,e processor

.,:,L··

.

, ~" tie,'as m u c h as a decade b e h i n d fO"~ .J=~ hardware d e v e l o p m e n t '~'lI:." \ ' r , 1 0i ,'!II,.., ~ntel rolled o u t Its first dual-core ~crop;oocessors last year, a n d Said this week. t h a t 1t plans to u p .oual-eore·processo.r d a t ? the~ With ~ new ~nergysavmg chip architecture i l l the ' U R C E : Intel The Associated P r e S I ~d q u a r t e r of20?6. By the e n d o f this . y e a r , I n t e l s~d, t;tearly three-

.

.'.

"

, - from . ContInued - Page D1

. ,' ,

Iau:

:.·a:~~~;7~~~7:~:.' !~~hi~~~~:p~~~'·:':0o.:.,~.ll:~~~,'J~~f~~'~~Rt;)'i,
. tiology.
';

i n t r o d u c e " q u a d - c o r e " c h i p s w i t h basic h a r d w a r e c h a l l ~ behin~ ! four microprocessors. I n time, t h e . :Bt"iJIti-core~~~5.a ~ c o m p a n y hopeS t o p u t d o z e n s o r o n o d i e r c o m ~ : ~ ! ~ . l l M 9 i t perlll~ps h~dreds o f microproc~- ~ S . A s " " ' e ~ c o ~ a g e m E m t :~ sors o n chips. C o m p u t e r s With edriesaay, Intel highlighted t h e :\< s u c h p o w e r m i g h t b e able t o drive wo~k o f Pixar Animation Studios, 1~ a n d s t e e r a car, for example, o r per- which has developed c o m p u t e r i lu' form o t h e r tasks well b e y o n d t h e software. ~t takes adyantage o f G:.., \ s c o p e o f t o d a y ' s teclmology. t h e ~ditio~ comp~ting p o w e r . oj ., . ha' multi-core chips prOVIde to p r o - wal . But It s n o t ~ m g .to p p e n d u c e m o r e detailed a n i m a t i o n . Will ~gh.t away. I n t e l saId ~1lS wee~ t h a t , ., ' 11 will m o v e conservatively t o U l t r a ..: Intel r n t r o d u c e d new develop- w~ d u c e eight-core c h i p s - a n d be- I~ent t o o l s for__p.m~~~~L m"a y o n d - b~a..!1~!lu~.!pp~te.rs cm:(t w'es~.l!Y..... !O~L~.Jl!U.d lLwilL. ~:le~ . et use them. :war, With _uruverslti~s to t e a c h JU8l1 L . -_ -;_. ,. . m u l t i - c o r e p r o g r a m n n n g . ' It· 'also l:asb M~tt-core chi~ m u s t ~e p r o - aDnO!lllced· aromoBonalCOntests c a r , grammed to coordinate t h e i r w o r k " 00. f ' p i g l l e ' ; ; - , evelope~ ,.interest, s a y ) and access to c o m p u t e r memory, prcimising,$5,OOO p ~~i·ttIiltq::- wi]"l s o t h e w o r k o f e a c h processor grammm:s : w h o " s 6 l v e " ' t t I d o e s n ' t conflict with t h e work o f '.:thrElailfug' ' p r o b l e m s " ' that' fufel ., (;:'}' ,an0tlll;lr, In~el, Cli1l!l &UCp'.·,pro-!..;.i~~:l.]ih;" .,,<.. .. _... , . " . , .. ~ .

.ULre.fi'

l.:-,
.:.~

.

-..., .· .

;'<';:~/~J .';' .' ~;S&';;?~:."'{\;~?'·: j:i:',i~ti··Lila~'.'.~' ...:" ;~\';.:'-~:~:j';'t';'~~ :"~'='/.:,,;:;,~:'.:...;~~ "';~~::.:'I\.i~~;10 ·.~ ~' ~ <· · . ~ .
. . alt

, ; . ' . . ' .. "."" , . Sp~~e iJ;l200,7, Intel p l a n s to
.,.,."

,\.Wl!!erW;~,;,:~ &~~m,~4-~ '<l~!y ~and t o ,ijle s~~~ ,

m u l t i..t~:.-~i~"'o~.I.· ¥>~~~,.,~<;'--:;,·,·:.i~ ,t , h . . . <i li ', . .~ ~ ('. ~,
I"

~ . .,

-"

.

.

~

, d·'!·'il', i

. . .....

4'6.1..«1

-'

CZiit.ti C

--

..-.. .

.. .

PRO'SE PL, E~, '3

......._~

I

ORIGINAL

Intel Corporation 2111 N. E. 25th Ave. JF3-147 Hillsboro, O R 97124

(!~l· ~"-d·
. eap ... ",a

,

.: .

. March. 2;-20- 70 . ..
~.,_...-

;

......

"

- _. . _ -

-_.-- .._......

~

....

i

_

~

-

,

~

Mr. Matthew Young SID No: 6242666 777 Stanton Blvd. Ontario, OR 97914
Re:

Our Ref.:
~"

~'

Young - Lancelot 2007-001728

'I.::~

Dear Mr. Young: We have received the materials you provided to us i n connection with the above. referenced matter. After consideration and review o f the submitted docmnents, Intel has . determined not to pursue this- matter. .
Thank you for your interest i n Intel Corporation. and for bringing this oppertunity to our attention. .
""·..

Sincerely,

Gwen a I d s Outside Submissions Coordinator
GOlde
", .t·',

~:"'~

:'.'

. 'r." .'. . .

~.

....·.

- - _.. _ _ . _----..;':.... ..;;.:. .- = ' .....;.~,

By D O N CLARK

( e r s a p o p u l a r p r o g r a m t h a t h e l p s ,slowcustomerli.dopti.onofvi~~·;' . \ .. u s e r s o f Apple Inco's Macintosh' a l i z a t i o n u n t i l i t i n t r o d u c e s ' : C h i p g i a n t I n t e l Corp., i n ~!!Y-:'i~if.s:e-Jn¥t:~$Y.:aiAnt,ec.is syst em run Microsoft Windows. more ~phisticated p r o d u c t s . ; . i g t e e i i l g t o i n v e s t $218.5 mil- worjdngWithInf#.9!!Y!®JI),i?;a- M icrosoft caused further consterThough W t u a l i z a t i o n colild i o n i n E M C Corp.'s VMwarelnc. ti9:i:l.-'9,a~¢.:g,· J)f9~u~tS" @.d be-. na m i t ; p r o v i d e d evidence t h a t a' l i e v e s s u c h ' m a l i c i o u s c o d e r e tion l a s t m o n t h by informing help sell more Microsoft operatl i t technology called v i r t u a l i z a - ,co.uid~~.d..ei~<;te4:' ' . ' · · .' abp o r t e r s a n d analysts i t was ing systems, i t could also shift out to r e l a x t h e r e s t r i c t i o n s - more control over t h e basic func- ' i o n i s s p a w n i n g n e w a l l i a n c e s , . M i c r o s o f t , w h i c h h a s c i t e d an d t h e n reversing t h a t decision tionsofPCs from t h e company to m d p o s i n g challenges t o Mi- VMware as a n emerging compet- sh ortly before i t was due to b e an- computer makers, sirid Neil Mac~osoft Corp. itor, a d d e d language t o t h e li- nounced. A draft announcement D onrld, a n a n a l y s t w i t h m a r k e t The deal, announced yester-' ce~ingagreementsfortwocon- expl ained t h e proposed poliCy researcher Gartner Inc.. . lay, comes as VMware is p r e p a r - s u m e r versions o f i t s Windows ch ange as a response t o customer . 1 s p o k e s m a n f o r Microsoft n g f o r a closely w a t c h e d i n i t i a l V i s t a o p e r a t i n g s y s t e m t h a t " f e e d b a c k " - b u t s o d i d a subse- t i e d i n e d t o c o m m e n t o n i t s r e " . m b l i c o f f e r i n g . I t also c o i n c i d e s b a r s u s e r s f r o m u s i n g v i r t u a l i z a - q u ent Microsoft statement say- cent flip-flop o r t h e triticism~ .vith ..!..$..!.owinile[ate~QJJ,t t i o n . More c o s t l y versions o f i n g i t was dropping t h e charlge. o f its, l i c e n s i n g policy, s t a t i n g , .vhether yiJ1l!aliz~1jQ.n..!Wlps..91:,. . Windows Vista w e r e n ' t covered Competitors a n d some ana- o i l y t h a t i t c~has r e a s s e s s e d th'Ei . . l u r t s c o m p u t e r secur,itx.-and,l" b y t h e prohibition. l y s t s a r e s k e p t i c a l a b o u t Mi- W'iIlli:ows v i r t u a l i z a t i o n policy .:' -vneffier Microsoft is m i s u s i n g . , The policy ir.ked cOrnp~titors, c r o s o f t s t a t e m e n t s t h a t i t was Illd d e c i d e d , t b a t we'Wil! i !l :lJftw life 'lke"rise's ·tu"·Si0~""TI:s;."'mciolling ··i1IVlwa1'e-lU'Id·Pa:ralJ. e~-'rn(il1vat~d "'oy ':"srturfty"t'"diF-'"4,aiil f!he ';orlgiiiill'''p'J!lUIi'~L. J.,. O- ~ .~- -,' ipread. K Inc., a u n i t of S W s o f t Inc. t h a t ofcerns. They s u g g e s t i t hopes t o ~ounced l a s t fall/! . . Intel, o f Santa. Clara, Calif.tV :\ : ) laid its 'venture-capital a r m willI .,--"-'~" ~ - .··.... - , . - . - - ~.....""" ...... ..v'~-' >-;"-'"'~-i(r'll''''-''''' . _ . , . ........-.~-;~,,~/ lay $23 a s h a r e for a stake repre·.; ~A r ' e Dt ;enting 2.5% o f VMware's com- , r t ' U ~... , ... · , . . . ~ n o n s h a r e s a f t e r t h e offering.~ l l e companies, a l r e a d y p a r t - ' l e r s , s a i d ' t h e y will b r o a d e n ' 'lork o n j o i n t m a r k e t i n g ·and:. /' echnology d e v e l o p m e n t . A n I n - ; el executive will become a direc- . . o r ofVMware, a Palo Alto, Calif., .. o m p a n y t h a t expects t o r a i s e ' ;741.4 million from t h e offering. i Virtualization uses s o f t w a r e ; h a t emulates t h e f e a t u r e s o f a i omputer, making i t e a s i e r t o : un multiple o p e r a t i n g s y s t e m s . n d application p r o g r a m s o n a . ingle machine. T h a t b e n e f i t s ; ompanies by using a g r e a t e r : ,ortion o f s e r v e r s ' c o m p u t i n g . apacity, reducing t h e n e e d tel .' l.ly additional systems. T h e p F o g n I D 1 b e t w e e n 1 M . Q P ~. rapng,sY-sj;!ml-....!!\~ ..hardr e c t o r o f emerging technolog i e s in·synlaiifec·"Corp:'s-5ecu.-

Intel to Invest in Virtualization Leader'

,.I
· ..1.:

:\

'EV ,

ORIGINAL

anbeus.edt(twtiti°R~CH9 '

rare:-:-c;.~~s.l:~~m~£m.1'U!:,-;

artso{?.~Y~~lntl;!fJJ!9.ygJ1.· :..p!~iiS".to.J<ee.p._cOll.al>.OI.~tUl.g
M-_

i r u s e s arid o t h e r malicious pro- '. faii:ircan't-~aitiick" 'sen:Sitive

ntn MicrosQft",~s<} Y@.:qt.s_.tp. !!p~ coht"P:te,~,,~· _< e..s .b_..d i. . . r' .! ~ 1L r m a k . r _. u.i l _ n . ..
rheu..!!,.£ll.ll~j §~~ll£ty .~capPlh·l· ,,-~p~~e .. -S9ftw.We,
ncapsulat~.alQ!!&. ;witp_.~.

rrtrbYlrvinliafnl"acmne l t h a t , ) u l d g u a r d a g a i n s t darigeroq~ . (: iliware. .., : \ "We firmly believe t h a t virtu-i," t l i z a t i o n i s a key t e c h n o l o g y t o ' r )Iving a whole b u n c h o f prob~ ...l ~ms," s a i d Steve Grobman, a n \ . : ltel. d i r e c t o r o f b u s i n e s s - c l i e n t

:npped-do~ op'er~!l~,~~;, .~;

J:

;

l

:chiteeture.

.

i f t C f O s e c r e t l y peif6i'Jri m i s - i

Ire'ac0!!1p.1\t~.r~~.9perat~ sy.~:
tiet~:~~. ?l.i~,~~!;:i~dri~~
. . . ._ .. -

3:~~~~ S.Q..uJ~~!~"Y!tt1LlMi~;I..: o n ~.91~~~r~..t!l.at.PQots.uP l>,e~

.But one c o n £ e m i s w.hm~r

j
I

,

di-I

, . - - - - .I

...
III:

Z

o

(!)
~

II

4 3
U

4

I

~-.

4
; 3

ORIGINAL

I:

.. _ j

)

'i'
f
\
;.

~

--;:

··:t~;':~'~

.\

"::-'~'}~' "",~,

.
,I;.;;. .

THE OREGONIAN ~. FRIDAV, JUNE 22,2007

ORIGINAL

.\ j

I
j
j
I

]

I .I
i 1

·1
1

j

I :

Tuesday, J u l y 10, 2 0 0 7

B3

~USINESS

TECHNOLOGY
place outdated file-man- make It eaSIer t o pull together agement systems. In t h e "unstructured" data ltke Web Share of world-wide relational-database 19905, t h e y invested in content ~d vi~eo files. market in 2006 m o r e d a t a b a s e software Oracle IS t r y i n g to whet comt o support new programs panies' appetite for new .softfor tasks like tracking cus- ware through discounts, with the t o m e r s a n d managing expectation t h a t customers will Web sites. . paybig fees for continuing techniEarly i n this. decade, cal support. David Hauser,'chief p u r c h a s e s slowed i n a technology officer of GotVMail t o u g h economy. 1WW, CommunicationsLLC,atelecom companies 'are a g a j n buy- company i n Weston. Mass., has ~ t o take advantage:JlL.latelY negotiated discounts of s e c u r i t y improvemeni:s, 50% on Oracle software with the 'andtointeractwith''11!W- help of M i r a Consulting Inc. .ne-~gence" Sl\ft~ Still,Mr.Hauserdoesn'texpectto L-others 7.9!' 1'T.!f$.lliit.helua..trli~ move to l l g f o r a t leasttwo years. healtl!.2f.thgjrJ:lusine.§.5... "The large feature sets have aINote: Figures don't add up to lOre; due to rounding " ' - o r a c l e i s n ' t o f f e r i n g d e - ready b e e n accoJJ;lplished," he Source: Gartner tails of l l g until its launch says. "Now it's small things. I'm in New York tomorrow, n o t going t o upgrade j u s t for must-have additions, he sees lit- but people briefed on theproduet that." . And Oracle increasingly faces tIe need to move quickly. say i t will include improved secu.Mr. Showers's view is echoed . r i t yr e a t u r e s and better capabili- competition from lower-cost dab y o t h e r corporate tech man- ties t o r making sense of content tabase alternatives from rivals agers, highlighting maturation such as video files and Web con- like Microsoft. Arindam Sen, lead i n t h e d a t a b a s e i n d u s t r y . tent. The Redwood Shores, Calif., databaseadministra,toratAmeri- . Whereas d a t a b a s e r e l e a s e s company also ,hasn't revealed its can . Power Conversion Corp" wel'e once Stln a s revolution- . pricing plans. An Oracli!' spokes" , 'pmo(Schi1cldet'~c"SA:'of t ary and typically sparked a buy- woman declined t o comment. Rueil-Malmaison, France, says ~~·tech thieves increas- heoftengetsphonecallsfroIilOring frenzy, t h e new one offers relatively incremental change. ~y use the Internet and other acle salespeople t r y i n g to perThe lukewarm reception echoes meanstosneakintocorporatec!.a:... suade him to switch from Mia phenomenon taking place else- tabase,s, oracle' a n a oth~rs !J,aye crosoft's SQL Server software. SQL Server costs less than Orwhere in software: M i c r o s o f t E"eenunderEressuretogivecolll:; Corp.'s latest Windows operat- parnes a better way to control ac- acle'ssoftware, but Oracle's dataing system, called Vista, re- cess,saysToQyWeiss,chiefexeeu: b a s e s o f t w a r e i s considered ceived far less fanfare when i t t i v e o f A p p n c a ~ t y I n e . . - heavier-duty, m o r e appropriate was released for consumers this a"Ne;"ry6"fI(aataba§jl:S.e.~ for b i g companies. I n recent ' year than, say, Windows 95 did. funr:-A"PP!i~~tiQ!t~.~9ID.t.Y. has years, though, "Microsoft has Still, expected changes in l l g f m : M l l i , and Mr. Weiss SaYS i t caught up with Oracle" i n soft- . illustrate an evolution i n how ls'J;ff.~,re secure, in part b~~ ware reliability and performcorporate tech buyers use soft- featUres t l i i i t let companies bet- ance, Mr. Sen argues. So h e is ware, says Bhavish Sood, an ana- t e r audit t h e activity inside theil:. sticking with Microsoft, which lys't a t Gartner Inc. I n the 1980s, 'databases-ana p u t more gpecific he says saves h i m $700,000 t o database software boomed as reStrICtiOnS on~'each user. The $800,000 a year compared with '. companies scrambled t o r e - -hew verswnis'"also expected t o Ol<l.cle.

Some Posstble Users~,: See No Need to Jump'i From Old Database!i
ByVAummVAM Oracle Corp. plans t o unveil a new v e r s i o n o f i t s c o r e s o f t w a r e t o m o r r o w for t h e f i r s \ time in four years. But custom, e r s like Mark Showers have alJ

Ora~leVpgrade Is Giving Pause
Lion's Share

decided t o s i t o u t t h j Oracle is launching a· versioh of its "database managemen·,r systeni" software, d u b b e d v e r i sion 11g, t h a t lets companies rei trieve and make sense of thehl digital data. But Mr. Shower~ chief information officer a t agri1 ! . cultural giant M o n s a n t o Co.1 says h i s c o m p a n y is likely t o take at least two o r three years, to s t a r t moving from t h e previ:J ous version, 1 0 9 - d o u b l e t h e ·· ..time MonSiillto I!rnce took. t, That's because i t typical!}' takes a t l e a s t several months for a company t o fully shift to a new version of Oracle's database softw a r e - t h e larger t h e company; the longer i t t a k e s - a n d lately, Oracle has made several small, incremental changes in new releases r a t h e r t h a n a few large, important ones t h a t would compel a company to quickly switch... St. Louis-based Monsanto employs 17,500 people and has annual revenue of $7.3 billion: "For a company like Monsanto, t h e s e new releases are a b i t likej t u r n i n g t h e b a t t l e s h i p , " Mr.! Showers says. Without many'

i.l. ,

~~:~i.

..... ~.. \

, ,

h,,,,_. , . .......

.

.'.

:

.40

·

·

~

_

ORIGINAL

. ~'
~_ . . . . · ·

r..
·:".:'.::·""'ri,:,

-.,. . . . . .

;::.

:\

~:i
:.;., ,

.6~:_M~~'N~~r. 200~ .USA.'tOS,3'
. . . '.. i
J'.' .

..... '. t ~. ';' '.-:' --::i~~~.;~. ~~:: ... ~ ,': .
.~.

. ." : \ ~ : - ~ ,
'':.".

'\

',~
~'

.

'F "

:.~

,

.........

M\ s e t\\~(\~o\J5
ai~\\+S
.'

CV '08-149 6 - BR
C E R T I F I C A T E OF S E R V I C E CASE NAME: ~ E W ~, YOW\J GCASE NUMBER: ( i f k n o w n )

v. -.......LJ<-.l-..lIol:!lolU.-F""-''-'''''--L.~

_

_

, and certifies the following: That I am incarcerated b y the Oregon Department o f Corrections at 7 Z Z st4ofoa Blvd,
COMES NOW,

fv\a-\\b~W

t,

>6uo~

eo,\-af\O >,

~-"'4

_

That on the ~day o f 2~ I personally placed in the Correctional Institution's mailing service A TRUE C O p y o f the following:

JJocenbec

,

Reepe.S\- \ - 0 \ \t,rO:I\l~) 0 \ S~\\I\C ~ & ~UMbo\\~Lia tQ~\Q\.l\\ 'tJ\\h aH:JdrJ EX~&.icrJ aJrl?" ,dl.-."fteo-adA ~essea wlme.\,-o the u., So, I:l\shld: ~rkJ ~L M . F.L ~
I placed the above in a securely enclosed, postage prepaid envelope, to the person(s) named at the places addressed below:

il~ZJ :--Q\U~7/_=_;;.4.L.___

_

Page 1 o f l - e e r t i f i c a t e o f Service

Form. 03.015