Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 4

Notice of Case Assignment: This case is assigned to Judge Anna J. Brown. (ecp)

Young v. Intel Corporation et al

Doc. 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Oregon

Matthew Robert Young, Plaintiff(s) vs. Intel Corporation et al, Defendant(s). Civil Case Assignment Order (a) Presiding Judge: The above referenced case has been filed in the US District Court for the District of Oregon and is assigned for all further proceedings to:
Presiding Judge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hon. Anna J. Brown Presiding Judge's Suffix Code* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . BR *These letters must follow the case number on all future filings.

Case No:

3:08-CV-1496-BR

(b) Courtroom Deputy Clerk: Questions about the status or scheduling of this case should be directed to Steven Minetto at [phone] or [e-mail] (c) Civil Docket Clerk: Questions about CM/ECF filing requirements or docket entries should be directed to Joei Lattz at [phone] or [e-mail] and Elizabeth Potter at (503) 3268061 or [e-mail]. (d) Place of Filing: Pursuant to LR 3.4(b) all conventionally filed documents must be submitted to the Clerk of Court, Room 740, Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse, 1000 S.W. Third Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204. (See also LR 100.4) (e) District Court Website: Information about local rules of practice, CM/ECF electronic filing requirements, and other related court information can be accessed on the court's website at www.ord.uscourts.gov.

Revised August 1, 2006

Civil Case Assignment Order

Dockets.Justia.com

(f) Consent to a Magistrate Judge: In accordance with 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, all United States Magistrate Judges in the District of Oregon are certified to exercise civil jurisdiction in assigned cases and, with the consent of the parties, may also enter final orders on dispositive motions, conduct trial, and enter final judgment which may be appealed directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Parties are encouraged to consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge by signing and filing the Consent to Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge (a copy of the consent form is included with this assignment order). There will be no adverse consequences if a party elects not to file a consent to a Magistrate Judge. Additional information about United States Magistrate Judges in the District of Oregon can be found on the court's website at www.ord.uscourts.gov. Dated: December 30, 2008 /s/ M. Kenney M. Kenney, Deputy Clerk Sheryl S. McConnell, Clerk of Court

By: For:

Revised August 1, 2006

Civil Case Assignment Order

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT District of Oregon

Matthew Robert Young, Plaintiff(s) vs. Intel Corporation et al, Defendant(s). Consent to Jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge and Designation of the Normal Appeal Route In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P 73(b), as counsel for the party (parties) identified below, I consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including entry of orders on dispositive motions, trial, and entry of final judgment. I understand that withholding consent will not result in any adverse consequences. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(c), I agree that any appeal from a final order or judgment entered by a United States Magistrate Judge shall proceed directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and not to a District Judge of this Court. DATED: Case No: 3:08-CV-1496-BR

Signature: Name & OSB ID: e-mail address: Firm Name: Mailing Address: City, State, Zip: Phone Number: Parties Represented cc: Counsel of Record

Revised December 1, 2004

Magistrate Consent Form