Fair Housing Council of Oregon v. Brookside Village Owners Association et al

Filing 158

ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation 146 is ADOPTED. See 2-page order attached. Signed on 5/8/2013 by Judge Marco A. Hernandez. (mr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF OREGON,
3:08-cv-03127-ST
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
BROOKSIDE VILLAGE OWNERS
ASSOCIATION, and BRADLEY REALTY,
LLC,
Defendants.

Joan-Marie Michelsen
OREGON LAW CENTER
424 NW 6th Street, Suite 102
P.O. Box 429
Grants Pass, OR 97528
Spencer M. Neal
OREGON LAW CENTER
State Support Unit
921 SW Washington Street, Suite 516
Portland, OR 97205
1 - ORDER

Attorneys for Plaintiff
James R. Dole
DOLE, SORENSON, RANSOM & FERGUSON, LLP
1867 Williams Hwy, Suite 109
Grants Pass, OR 97527
Attorney for Defendant
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”)
(doc. #146) on October 19, 2012. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
F&R. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and rule 72(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s F&R, the district court
must make a de novo review of that portion. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561
F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir.
2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and conclude that the
objections do not provide a basis to modify the F&R. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions
of the record de novo and find no error in the Magistrate Judge’s F&R.
CONCLUSION
The Magistrate Judge’s F&R (doc. #146) is ADOPTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this

day of ______________, 2013.

___________________________
MARCO A. HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge

2 - ORDER