Morton v. Thomas
Filing
16
OPINION & ORDER: On August 14, 2009, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14 ) that the court deny Petitioner Keith Allen Mortons pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2), and enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice.The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Neither party timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magis trate Judge Papaks factual findings de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo., I find no error. Accord ingly, I ADOPT magistrate Judge Papakss Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14 ) as my own opinion. Mortons pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2 ) is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed on September 4th, 2009 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON
KEITH ALLEN MORTON, Petitioner,
CV 09-53-PK OPINION AND ORDER
v. J.E. THOMAS, Warden, FCI Sheriden, Respondent. __________________________________ REDDEN, Judge: On August 14, 2009, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14) that the court deny Petitioner Keith Allen Morton's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2), and enter judgment dismissing this case without prejudice. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Neither party timely filed objections. This relieves me of my obligation to review Magistrate Judge Papak's factual findings de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear PAGE 1 - OPINION AND ORDER
Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT magistrate Judge Papak's's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 14) as my own opinion. Morton's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 2) is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 4th day of September, 2009.
/s/ James A. Redden James A. Redden United States District Judge
PAGE 2 - OPINION AND ORDER
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
