Sterling Savings Bank v. Citadel Development Company, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER - The Findings and Recommendation 39 is ADOPTED. Defendants' motion 19 to strike and defendants' motion 16 to dismiss plaintiff's claim for appointment of receiver are GRANTED and plaintiff's motion 9 to appoint a receiver is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/10/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (peg)

FILEJr09 SEP 10 10:25USOC-<RP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T F O R THE DISTRICT O F O R E G O N

STERLING SAVINGS Plaintiff,

BAN~

C i v i l No. 0 9 - 4 0 4 - A C ORDER

v.
CITADEL D E V E L O P M E N T C O M P A N Y , INC.; J. KENYON EAGON; H E A T H E R EAGON; E A G O N C A P I T A L V E N T U R E S , INC.; M A R K S. DANE; CLAUDIA P. DANE, Defendants.

H A G G E R T Y , D i s t r i c t Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta h a s issued a Findings and Recommendation [39] i n this action. T h e Magistrate Judge recommends granting defendants' Motion to Strike [19] and defendants' Motion to Dismiss P l a i n t i f f s Claim for Appointment o f Receiver [16] and denying p l a i n t i f f s Motion to Appoint a Receiver [9]. No objections were filed, a n d the case was referred to this court.

1 - ORDER

The matter is n o w before m e pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b}(I}(B) and Federal R u l e o f Civil Procedure 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, t h e court need o n l y satisfy i t s e l f that t h e r e i s no d e a r error o n t h e face o f t h e r e c o r d i n o r d e r t o a c c e p t t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n o f t h e Magistrate Judge. Campbell v. United States Dist. C t , 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974). N o d e a r e r r o r a p p e a r s o n t h e face o f t h e r e c o r d . T h i s c o u r t a d o p t s t h e F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n i n its entirety.

CONCLUSION
T h e Findings and Recommendation [39] is adopted. Defendants' M o t i o n to Strike [19] a n d defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's C l a i m for Appointment o f Receiver [16] are GRANTED a n d plaintiff's Motion to A p p o i n t a Receiver [9] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 10 day o f September, 2009.

~~~
U n i t e d States District J u d g e

2-0RDER