Maxwell v. Kelly Services, Inc.

Filing 51

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 49 . Accordingly, the Court: 1. GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 36 as to Plaintiff's First Claim to the extent that Plaintiff alleges Defendant's failure to reinstate Plaintiff constituted pregnancy discrimination. 2. DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 36 as to Plaintiff's First Claim to the extent that she alleges Defendant's removal of Plaintiff from Merix constituted pregnancy discrimination. 3. DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 36 as to Plaintiff's Second, Third, and Fourth Claims. Signed on 7/7/2010 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (mr)

Maxwell v. Kelly Services, Inc.

Doc. 51

--- ~ t (; 1 ' " y rll~D1--"-~\ , _1: J i . .r:

1~~·A5usDC·ORP ~_~. .'

I N THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON PORTLAND D I V I S I O N

D I A N A MAXWELL,

09-CV-405-PK

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
KELLY S E R V I C E S , I N C . ,
Defendant:.

CRAIG A C R I S P I N

Crispin Employment Lawyers 1834 S.W. 58th Suite 200 P o r t l a n d , OR 9 7 2 2 1 [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff
CLAY D . CREPS K R I S T A N . HARDWICK JOCELYNNE P . MCADORY

B u l l i v a n t H o u s e r B a i l e y , PC 300 Pioneer Tower 888 S.W. F i f t h Avenue - P o r t l a n d , OR 9 7 2 0 4 [phone] Attorneys for Defendant

1

- ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

BROWN, J u d g e .

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and R e c o m m e n d a t i o n ( # 4 9 ) o n May 2 6 , 2 0 1 0 , i n w h i c h h e r e c o m m e n d s t h i s Court grant in part and deny in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (#36). T h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t
(1)

pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) Procedure 72 (b) .

(B) a n d F e d e r a l R u l e o f C i v i l

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, t h i s Court i s relieved of i t s obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley See

U n i f i e d S c h o o l D i s t . , 708 F . 2 d 4 5 2 , 454 (9 th C i r . 1 9 8 3 ) .

a l s o L o r i n C o r p . v . G o t o & C o . , 7 0 0 F . 2 d 1 2 0 2 , 1 2 0 6 (8 t h C i r . 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court

does not find any error.

CONCLUSION T h e C o u r t ADOPTS M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e P a p a k ' s F i n d i n g s a n d Recommendation (#49). 1. Accordingly, the Court:

GRANTS D e f e n d a n t ' s M o t i o n f o r S u m m a r y J u d g m e n t ( # 3 6 ) a s to P l a i n t i f f ' s First Claim to the extent that Plaintiff alleges Defendant's failure to reinstate Plaintiff constituted pregnancy discrimination.

2.

DENIES D e f e n d a n t ' s M o t i o n f o r S u m m a r y J u d g m e n t ( # 3 6 ) a s to P l a i n t i f f ' s First Claim to the extent that she

2

- ORDER

alleges D e f e n d a n t ' s r e m o v a l o f P l a i n t i f f f r o m M e r i x constituted pregnancy discrimination. 3.
DENIES D e f e n d a n t ' s M o t i o n f o r S u m m a r y J u d g m e n t ( # 3 6 ) a s

to P l a i n t i f f ' s Second, Third, and Fourth Claims.

IT I S SO ORDERED.
DATED t h i s

~day o f

July, 2010.

ANNA J . BROWN United States District Judge

-

3

- ORDER