Giess v. Homecomings Financial, LLC et al

Filing 153

ORDER. Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation 125 on January 24, 2012. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to give the record de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir 1983). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F2d 452, 454 (9th Cir 1983). I find no error. Accordingly, I adopt the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. Dexter's motion for Leave to Amend 103 is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/17/2012 by Judge James A. Redden. (pvh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

SARA DEXTER, in her capacity as
personal representative of the estate of
JOHN GEISS,

Plaintiff,

v.
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL,
L.L.C., CONTRACTORS BONDING
AND INSURANCE COMPANY,
PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE
COMPANY, AND DEUTSCHE BANK
COMPANY AMERICAS, as TlUstee for
RALI Series 2007 HQ6 Trust,

Defendants.

/1/
/1/
1//

ORDER-l

3:09-cv-00493-PK

ORDER

REDDEN, Judge:
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Reconnnendation (#125) on January
24,2012. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(I)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P.

'72(0).
When, as here, no objections are filed, the

COUlt

is not required to give tlie record de novo

review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F2d 1202, 1206 (9 th Cir 1983). See also Britt v.
Simi Valley Unified School Dis!., 708 F2d 452, 454 (9 th Cit" 1983). I find no enOl'. Accordingly,

I adopt the Findings and Reconnnendation of Magistrate Judge Paul Papak.
Dexter's motion for Leave to Amend (#103) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 17th day of May, 2012.

United States District Judge

ORDER-2