Charlson, et al., v. Carson Helicopters, Inc., et al.,

Filing 46

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/23/09 ORDERING the Status Conference reset for 7/13/09 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report is to be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. (Becknal, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 5/7/2009.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MAY 4, 2009 STATUS CONFERENCE -Case No.: 2:08-CV-02756 GB/KM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD CHARLSON, on behalf of THE ) ESTATE OF SCOTT CHARLSON, RICHARD ) CHARLSON, individually, NINA ) CHARLSON, individually, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CARSON HELICOPTERS, INC., an Oregon ) Corporation; UNITED TECHNOLOGIES ) CORP., a Delaware Corporation; SIKORSKY ) AIRCRAFT CORP., a Delaware Corporation; ) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New ) York Corporation, and Does 1 through 100, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: Case No.: 2:08-CV-02756 GB/KM STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MAY 4, 2009 STATUS CONFERENCE WHEREAS, there is pending motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation concerning this and other cases related to the August 5, 2008 helicopter crash; and WHEREAS, the parties in this case have been meeting and conferring regarding a stipulation and proposed order to transfer this case to the District of Oregon pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); ACCORDINGLY, the parties respectfully request that the May 4, 2009 Status Conference be continued 60 days. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 20, 2009 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP By: /s/ Stephen L. Nelson______________ STEPHEN L. NELSON JOANNE MADDEN Attorneys for Defendant CARSON HELICOPTERS, INC. Dated: April 20, 2009 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM By: /s/ Brian J. Malloy______________ THOMAS BRANDI BRIAN MALLOY Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Estate of Scott Charlson Richard Charlson Nina Charlson Dated: April 20, 2009 GLYNN & FINLEY, LLP By: /s/ Clement L. Glynn______________ CLEMENT L. GLYNN JAMES M. HANLON, JR. Attorneys for Defendant General Electric Company Dated: April 20, 2009 MENDES & MOUNT, LLP By: /s/ Christopher S. Hickey______________ JAMES W. HUNT CHRISTOPHER S. HICKEY ADAM A. GRABLE Attorneys for Defendants Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation and United Technologies Corporation 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MAY 4, 2009 STATUS CONFERENCE -Case No.: 2:08-CV-02756 GB/KM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 4/23/09 ORDER The Court has read and considered the stipulation between the parties requesting that the May 4, 2009 Status Conference be continued 60 days. ACCORDINGLY, it is ordered that the May 4, 2009 Status conference is continued to July 13, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 10. prior to the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Garland Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge A joint status report is to be filed fourteen days 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MAY 4, 2009 STATUS CONFERENCE -Case No.: 2:08-CV-02756 GB/KM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING THE MAY 4, 2009 STATUS CONFERENCE -Case No.: 2:08-CV-02756 GB/KM I, Brian J. Malloy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and Order Continuing the May 4, 2009 Status Conference. I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the within document has been obtained from each of the signatories herein. Dated: April 20, 2009 THE BRANDI LAW FIRM By: /s/ Brian J. Malloy______________ BRIAN MALLOY Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Estate of Scott Charlson Richard Charlson Nina Charlson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?