Stewart v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER: This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak (# 19 ) dated October 6,2009 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs objections that were incorrectly docketed in Cv 09-687-PK be fi led in this case. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (# 15 ) is granted. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by December 2, 2009. If plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint by December 2, 2009, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed on November 2nd, 2009 by Judge Garr M. King. (eo)

IN T H E UNITED STATES DISTRICT C O U R T F O R THE DISTRICT OF O R E G O N M O R S E E. S T E W ART, Plaintiff, ) ) ) )

Civil C a s e N o . 0 9 - 6 8 8 - P K ORDER

v.

)

) M O R T G A G E ELECTRONIC ) R E G I S T R A T I O N S Y S T E M S , INC.; F I R S T ) HORIZON H O M E LOAN ) CORPORATION; FIRST H O R I Z O N ) NATIONAL C O R P O R A T I O N F I R S T ) TENNESSEE BANK; FIRST AMERICAN ) TITLE I N S U R A N C E C O M P A N Y , ) ) Defendants. )

------------)
Morse E. Stewart 57985 T i m b e r R o a d Vernonia, O r e g o n 9 7 0 6 4 Pro Se P l a i n t i f f

Page 1 - O R D E R

Matthew R. Cleverley McCarthy and H o l t h u s 600 W i n s l o w W a y E a s t # 2 3 4 B a i n b r i d g e I s l a n d , W a s h i n g t o n 98110 A t t o r n e y for D e f e n d a n t s

KING, Judge: T h e H o n o r a b l e P a u l P a p a k , U n i t e d States M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e , filed F i n d i n g s a n d Recommendation on October 6, 2009. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation, but they were incorrectly docketed in case number Cv 09-687-PK. No response to the objections is necessary for the court to resolve the objections. When either party objects to any portion o f a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination o f that portion o f the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Com. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review o f the rulings o f Magistrate Judge Papak. This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation o f Magistrate Judge Papak (# 19) dated October 6 , 2 0 0 9 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that P l a i n t i f f s objections that were incorrectly docketed in Cv 09-687 -PK be filed in this case. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (# 15) is granted. Plaintiff

Page 2 - ORDER

may file an amended complaint by December 2, 2009. I f plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint by December 2, 2009, the case will be dismissed with prejudice. DATED this

2

day o f November, 2009.

A'UMv/n~7
GARR M. KING U n i t e d States D i s t r i c t J u d g e

J

Page 3 - O R D E R