Potter v. Crosswhite

Filing 33

ORDER: This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak (#29) dated July 29, 2010 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Crosswhite's Motion to Dismiss (#20) is granted. This action is dismissed. Motion to Dismiss 20 . Signed on 9/20/2010 by Judge Garr M. King. (mja)

Potter v. Crosswhite

Doc. 33

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MARK POTTER, Plaintiff, ORDER v. THOMAS CROSSWHITE, Defendant. ___________________________________ Mark W. Potter Attorney at Law 9200 SE Sunnybrook Blvd., Suite 430 Clackamas, Oregon 97015 Pro Se Plaintiff Mark E. Griffin Griffin & McCandlish 215 SW Washington Street, Suite 202 Portland, Oregon 97204 Attorney for Defendant Page 1 - ORDER Civil Case No. 09-814-PK

Dockets.Justia.com

KING, Judge: The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 29, 2010. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Papak. This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak (#29) dated July 29, 2010 in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Crosswhite's Motion to Dismiss (#20) is granted. This action is dismissed. DATED this 20th day of September, 2010.

/s/ Garr M. King GARR M. KING United States District Judge

Page 2 - ORDER