United States Department of Labor v. R.M. International, Inc. et al

Filing 65

ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judg Hubel's Findings and Recommendation 55 . Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion 24 for Summary Judgment. Signed on 03/28/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Plaintiff, v. R.M. INTERNATIONAL, INC., and JAMES KEYES, Defendants. 09-CV-863-HU ORDER BRUCE L. BROWN EVAN H. NORDBY United States Department of Labor Office of the Solicitor 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 943 Seattle, Wash. 98101 (206) 553-0940 Attorneys for Plaintiff RICHARD N. VAN CLEAVE TODD A. HACKETT 601 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 2300 Portland, OR 97204 (503) 276-2181 Attorneys for Defendants 1 OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, Judge. Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubel issued Findings and Recommendation (#55) on March 3, 2011, in which he recommends this Court deny Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. ReynaSee also Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#55). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' Motion (#24) for Summary Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 28th day of March, 2011. /s/ Anna J. Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States District Judge 2 OPINION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?