Seal Source, Inc. v. Calderson et al

Filing 63

OPINION AND ORDER: The court adopts Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation 61 . Defendant Castro's Motion to Quash Service of Summons on her 56 is granted. Signed on 8/9/10 by Judge James A. Redden. (cib)

Download PDF
Seal Source, Inc. v. Calderson et al Doc. 63 FlLED7 10 AUG OS i.1 :2SUSDC-ORP IN T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON S E A L S O U R C E , INC., CV. 09-875 H U Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CESAR CALDERON; SEAL SUPPLY P E R U SA; D U L I A C A S T R O ; C A S D E L H N O S S A ; J O H N D O E S 1 T H R O U G H 10, Defendants. R E D D E N , Judge: M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e D e n n i s R u b e l i s s u e d F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n ( # 6 1 ) o n J u l y 15, 2 0 1 0 , r e c o m m e n d i n g that d e f e n d a n t C a s t r o ' s M o t i o n t o Q u a s h S e r v i c e o f S u m m o n s o n h e r ( # 5 6 ) b e granted. T h e m a t t e r is n o w b e f o r e t h i s c o u r t p u r s u a n t t o 28 U . S . c . § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ( B ) a n d Fed. R. C i v . P. 7 2 ( b ) . OPINION AND ORDER- 1 Dockets.Justia.com When, as here, n o objections are filed, t h e c o u r t i s not required t o r e v i e w the factual or legal conclusions o f t h e Magistrate Judge. See, Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F . 3 d 1114, 1121 (9 th Cir. 2003). A f t e r r e v i e w , I agree w i t h J u d g e H u b e l ' s R e c o m m e n d a t i o n . T h e r e i s no l e g a l error. T h e c o u r t a d o p t s M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e H u b e l ' s F i n d i n g s a n d R e c o m m e n d a t i o n s (#61). D e f e n d a n t Castro's M o t i o n t o Q u a s h Service o f S u m m o n s o n h e r (#56) is granted. I T IS SO O R D E R E D . Dated this y'"day of August, 2010. OPINION AND ORDER- 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?