Palazzo Vintage Homes, LLC et al v. Urban Housing Development, LLC et al

Filing 83

OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 73 . Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution 45 is DENIED. Defendants' motion for alternative sanctions 45 is DENIED. Signed on 9/15/10 by Judge James A. Redden. (cib)

Download PDF
Palazzo Vintage Homes, LLC et al v. Urban Housing Development, LLC et al Doc. 83 FILED'lOSEP 161103USDC{w UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION PALAZZO VINTAGE HOMES, LLC, an Oregon company, and PALAZZO VINTAGE REPRODUCTION HOMES, LLC, an Oregon company, Plaintiffs, CV 09-1 005-JE OPINION AND ORDER v. URBAN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, LLC, an Oregon company, CONCEPT DESIGN AND ASSOCIATES, an Oregon business, STEWARDSHIP REALTY, LLC, an Oregon company, and VLADIMIR OZERUGA, an individual, Defendants. REDDEN, Judge: On August 25,2010, Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed his Findings and PAGE 1 - OPINION AND ORDER Dockets.Justia.com Recommendation (doc. 73) that the court deny both Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack o f prosecution (doc. 45), and their motion for alternative sanctions (doc. 45-1). The matter is n o w before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ( A ) ; Fed. R Civ. P. neb). N e i t h e r p a r t y t i m e l y f i l e d o b j e c t i o n s . T h i s r e l i e v e s m e o f m y o b l i g a t i o n to r e v i e w M a g i s t r a t e Judge Jelderks' factual fmdings de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 6 3 6 ( b ) ( l ) ( C ) ; Simpson v. Lear Astronics Com., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed t h e legal principles de n o v o , I find n o error. Accordingly, I A D O P T M a g i s t r a t e J u d g e J e r d e r k s ' F i n d i n g s and R e c o m m e n d a t i o n (doc. 73) as m y o w n opinion. Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack o f prosecution (doc. 45) is , DENIED. Defendants' motion for alternative sanctions (doc. 45-1) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this I f -day o f September, 2010. e s A . Redden d States D i s t r i c t J u d g e PAGE 2 - OPINION AND O R D E R

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?