Northwest Pipe Company v. RLI Insurance Company et al
Filing
239
Order. The Court denies Northwest Pipes Motion 177 for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court is setting a trial limited to those disputed fact issues on the following schedule: no later than 09/06/2013, a Joint Stipulation is due re: Jury or Court Tr ial. No later than 10/04/2013, final expert witness disclosures are due. No later than 10/22/2013 final rebuttal expert disclosures are due. A 2-day trial to resolve the factual disputes as to the availability of commercially reasonable commercial g eneral liability insurance lacking an absolute pollution exclusion will begin at 9:00 a.m. on 11/7/2013. No later than 09/06/2013, RLI shall file its supplemental memorandum in opposition to Wausaus Motion 191 , limited to 10 pages. Joint SurReply is due 09/19/2013. Motions 191 and 197 will go under advisement 09/19/2013. the Court orders that no party shall file any additional motions without first obtaining leave of Court. No later than 09/13/2013, and after meaningful conferral with a ll necessary parties, Northwest Pipe may file a motion for leave to amend its Complaint. If such motion is unopposed, Northwest Pipe shall file simultaneously a jointly proposed case management plan and schedule to resolve such additional claim(s). If such motion is opposed, memoranda in opposition are due 09/27/2013; any necessary reply memorandum from Northwest Pipe is due 10/04/2013, and the Court will then take such Motion under advisement. No later than 10/04/2013, Wausau shall file a join t status report as to whether Wausau proposes to file a motion with respect to Wausaus claim that Wausaus obligation to Northwest Pipe is discharged because Wausaus policies have been exhausted. Finally, the Court requires the parties to reconsider ADR and to file an updated Joint ADR report no later than 10/04/2013.See attached 2 page Order for full text. (bb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
Case No.
3:09cv-01126-BR
Date: August 27, 2013
Case Title: Northwest Pipe Company v. RLI Insurance Company et al
Presiding Judge: Anna J. Brown
Courtroom Deputy: Bonnie Boyer
DOCKET ENTRY: Order
On August 23, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on Northwest Pipe’s Motion (#177) for Partial
Summary Judgment that No Share of the Defense Costs Should Be Assigned to Northwest Pipe; Wausau’s
Motion (#191) for Summary Judgment on its Crossclaim for Equitable Contribution Against RLI
Insurance Company; and ACE’s Motion (#197) for Joinder to Wausau’s Motion (#191).
For the reasons stated on the record, the Court concludes Northwest Pipe, as the moving party, has
not shown there is not any issue of material fact as to the availability of commercially reasonable
commercial general liability insurance lacking an absolute pollution exclusion. The Court, therefore,
denies Northwest Pipe’s Motion (# 177) for Partial Summary Judgment. In order to resolve the fact
issues underlying Northwest Pipe’s Motion ( #177) and RLI’s previous Motion (#148) on the same issue,
the Court is setting a trial limited to these disputed fact issues on the following schedule:
(1) No later than September 6, 2013, the parties shall file a Joint Stipulation indicating whether
the trial of these limited issues will be to a jury or to the Court, and upon the receipt of the parties’ Joint
Stipulation, the Court will issue a scheduling order for submission of trial papers preceding this trial,
including potentially a Pretrial Order, and, as necessary, proposed jury instructions.
(2) No later than October 4, 2013, the parties shall make their final expert witness disclosures as to
the fact issues to be decided in this trial, including all opinions on which an expert proposes to testify and
all factual material on which such expert opinion(s) are based. No later than October 11, 2013, the parties
may make final rebuttal expert disclosures. No expert will be permitted to testify to any matter not
disclosed by these deadlines. To the extent any additional fact discovery is needed to complete
preparation for this trial, it must be completed no later than October 4, 2013. The Court encourages the
parties to avoid the expense of expert witness depositions. If the parties are unable to agree on an efficient
method for an opponent to obtain clarification or other information about an expert’s opinions, the parties
may approach the Court to resolve the issue. In any event, all such expert discovery efforts must be
concluded by October 11, 2013.
(3) A 2-day trial to resolve the factual disputes as to the availability of commercially reasonable
commercial general liability insurance lacking an absolute pollution exclusion will begin at 9:00 a.m. on
November 7, 2013.
As to Wausau’s Motion (#191) for Summary Judgment and ACE’s Joinder (# 197) , the Court
concludes in the exercise of its discretion that supplemental briefing is needed as noted on the record and
as follows:
(1) No later than September 6, 2013, RLI shall file its supplemental memorandum in opposition to
Wausau’s Motion (#191), limited to 10 pages, addressing why, on the existing record, Wausau and ACE
are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and, in particular, what legal standard RLI alleges Wausau
and ACE failed to meet to establish the right to summary judgment as a matter of law.
(2) No later than September 19, 2013, Wausau and ACE shall file a joint surreply including their
specification(s) as to the amount(s) for which Wausau and ACE contend the Court should enter a
judgment and the costs that remain in dispute as between Northwest Pipe, Wausau, and ACE.
The Court will take Wausau’s Motion (#191) and ACE’s Joinder (#197) under advisement on
September 19, 2013. In the event the Court denies Wausau’s Motion (#191), the Court will conduct a
Rule 16 Conference at the conclusion of the November 7, 2013 trial on other issues in order to set a
separate trial schedule to resolve any remaining issues raised by Wausau's Motion (#191), including as to
the reasonableness and necessity of defense costs paid by Wausau and ACE.
With respect to further proceedings in this matter, the Court orders that no party shall file any
additional motions without first obtaining leave of Court to do so, except the Court has already permitted
the filing of the following Motions:
(1) No later than September 13, 2013, and after meaningful conferral with all necessary parties,
Northwest Pipe may file a motion for leave to amend its Complaint to add a claim for declaratory relief in
light of recently-passed Oregon legislation. If such motion is unopposed, Northwest Pipe shall file
simultaneously a jointly proposed case management plan and schedule to resolve such additional claim(s).
If such motion is opposed, memoranda in opposition are due September 27, 2013; any necessary reply
memorandum from Northwest Pipe is due October 4, 2013, and the Court will then take such Motion
under advisement.
(2) No later than October 4, 2013, Wausau shall file a joint status report as to whether Wausau
proposes to file a motion with respect to Wausau’s claim that Wausau’s obligation to Northwest Pipe is
discharged because Wausau’s policies have been exhausted.
Finally, the Court requires the parties to reconsider ADR and to file an updated Joint ADR report
no later than October 4, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?