Grassmueck v. Bishop et al

Filing 118

ORDER: Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 65 Bishop, 15 Schneider, and 21 DeVan; and Adopting Findings and Recommendation 112 21]. The claims against defendants Schneider, DeVan and Bishop are dismissed without prejudice. Signed on 4/27/10 by Judge Garr M. King. (ljl)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION MICHAEL A. GRASSMUECK, Court Appointed Receiver for Global Online Direct, Inc., its Subsidiaries and Affiliates, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN BISHOP, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ Civil Case No. 09-1257-HU

ORDER

Julie R. Vacura Danielle J. Hunsaker Larkins Vacura 621 SW Morrison Street, Suite 1450 Portland, Oregon 97205-3817 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Page 1 - ORDER

Russell De Van 12570 North 104th Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85260 Yada Schneider 1323 S. Scenic Heights Drive Prescott, Arizona 86303 Stephen Bishop 10735 North Belmont Court Houston, Texas 77065 Pro Se Defendants KING, Judge: The Honorable Dennis Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on April 5, 2010. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2nd 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation dated April 5, 2010 (#112) in its entirety. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (#15 Schneider, #21 DeVan, #65 Bishop) are granted. The claims against defendants Schneider, DeVan and Bishop are dismissed without prejudice. DATED this 27th day of April, 2010.

/s/ Garr M. King GARR M. KING United States District Judge Page 2 - ORDER