Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER: Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubels recommendation on all issues, and I ADOPT the F&R 62 as my own opinion, 43 . Signed on 7/11/2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (dls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION
BRIDGET DAVIS, Guardian ad
litem for Brianne Davis,
3:09-cv-1488-HU
Plaintiff,
OPINION AND ORDER
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
MOSMAN, J.,
On May 3, 2011, Magistrate Judge Hubel issued his Findings and Recommendation
(“F&R”) [62] in the above-captioned case recommending that the defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment be granted as to the wage claim, and denied as to the remaining claim.
Defendant objected [64], and plaintiff responded [65].
DISCUSSION
The magistrate judge makes only recommendations to the court, to which any party may
file written objections. The court is not bound by the recommendations of the magistrate judge,
but retains responsibility for making the final determination. The court is generally required to
make a de novo determination regarding those portions of the report or specified findings or
recommendation as to which an objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). However, the court
is not required to review, de novo or under any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of
the magistrate judge as to those portions of the F&R to which no objections are addressed. See
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121
(9th Cir. 2003). While the level of scrutiny under which I am required to review the F&R
depends on whether or not objections have been filed, in either case, I am free to accept, reject,
or modify any part of the F&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Upon review, I agree with Judge Hubel’s recommendation on all issues, and I ADOPT
the F&R [62] as my own opinion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
11th
day of July, 2011.
/s/ Michael W. Mosman
MICHAEL W. MOSMAN
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?