Otoski et al v. Avidyne Corporation et al
Filing 90
Findings & Recommendation: Cessna's Motion for Summary Judgment 50 should be granted because Otoski's claims against it are precluded as a matter of law by the bankruptcy court's November 28, 2007 Order. Otoski's (Corrected) Motion for Leave to Conduct Destructive Examination 65 should be granted because Cessna is no longer a party to the action, rendering its objections moot. Signed on 10/6/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
