Lynch v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 21

ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendation 19 . The Findings and Recommendation 19 is adopted and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. Signed on 8/27/10 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)

Lynch v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Doc. 21

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BROGAN T. LYNCH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. HAGGERTY, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [19] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that a judgment be entered affirming the Commissioner's decision. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 1- ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com

Civil No. 09-6170-PK ORDER

72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974). No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation and the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. CONCLUSION The Findings and Recommendation [19] is adopted and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 27 day of August, 2010.

/s/

Ancer L. Haggerty Ancer L. Haggerty United States District Judge

2- ORDER