Phoenix v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER: Granting Motion for Attorney Fees 22 . After considering Plaintiff's Motion, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby granted in the sum of $15,423.00 as full settlement of all claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). The net requested herein, less the EAJA fee awarded of $5,696.43, is $9,726.57, and Defendant shall pay this amount to Plaintiffs counsel, less an administrative assessment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(d). There are no other costs. Signed on 12/9/2014 by Magistrate Judge John Jelderks. (jtj)
Drew L. Johnson
Kathryn Tassinari
rwood@callatg.com
kathrynt50@comcast.net
1700 Valley River Drive
Eugene, OR 97401
(541) 434-6466
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
AINSLEY S. KELLY, Survivor of
JESSI-KEALOHA PHOENIX,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Civil No. CV 09-6324-JE
ORDER APPROVING
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT
TO 42 U.S.C. §406(b)
Commissioner of Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
____________________________________
After considering Plaintiff's Motion, and counsel for Defendant having no
objection, Plaintiff’s Motion is hereby granted in the sum of $15,423.00 as full settlement
of all claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). The net requested herein,
less the EAJA fee awarded of $5,696.43, is $9,726.57, and Defendant shall pay this
ORDER APPROVING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C §406 (b) -
1
amount to Plaintiff’s counsel, less an administrative assessment pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
406(d). There are no other costs.
9th
IT IS SO ORDERED this day of December _____, 2014
/s/ John Jelderks
______________________________
XXXXXXXXX
U.S. District Judge/Magistrate Judge
PRESENTED BY:
By:
/s/ DREW L. JOHNSON
Drew L. Johnson, OSB #75200
Of Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORDER APPROVING ATTORNEYS FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C §406 (b) -
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?