Wilcox v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 34

ORDER Approving Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. After considering Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, Order is hereby granted in the sum of $12,999 as full settlement of al l claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Commissioner shall deduct from $12,999 an administrative assessment under 42 U.S.C. § 406(d) and pay Plaintiff's counsel the balance. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel will refund to Plaintiff the EAJA fee of $5,234.69. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2012, by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

Download PDF
Kathtyn Tassinari Robert Baron kathrynt50@comcast.net HARDER, WELLS, BARON & MANNING, P.e. 474 Willamette, Suite 200 Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 686-1969 Of Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RHODA W. WILCOX Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 09-6349-HU ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. §406(b) ------~------------~) After considering Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees, and counsel for Defendant having no objection, Order is hereby granted in the sum of $12,999 as full settlement of all claims for attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Commissioner shall deduct from $12,999 an ORDER APPROVING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C.§406(b) -I administrative assessment under 42 USC §406(d) and pay Plaintiffs counsel the balance. In addition, Plaintiffs counsel will refund to Plaintiff the EAJA fee of $5,234.69. IT IS SO ORDERED this ~ day of January, 2012. -m~';-m~ U.S. District Judge PRESENTED BY: sf Kathryn Tassinari Of Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER APPROVING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C.§406(b) -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?