Potter v. Robert Burney ILIT et al

Filing 139

Order to Deposit Funds. Signed on 06/24/2011 by Judge Anna J. Brown. (bb)

Download PDF
Martin W. Jaqua, OSB #860528 mjaqua@rickles-Iaw.com THE RICKLES LAW FIRM, PC One SW Columbia Street, Suite 1850 Portland, Oregon 97258-2001 Telephone: 503.229.1850 Facsimile: 503.229.1856 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON MARK POTTER, CV10-124-BR Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS HELEN E. CAVALETTO, et aI., Defendants, and THOMAS CROSSWHITE and BARBARA CROSSWHITE, Intervenor Defendants. 1. In accordance with Plaintiff's Motion to Deposit Additional Funds (filed on June 23, 2011 as Docket No. 138), in the above-entitled interpleader action, the Clerk is directed to accept Plaintiff's cashier's Page 1 - ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS \\ALF·FSlRlF\CLlENTS\7000\7301.23BIINTERPlEADER CAS BORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS·REVISED.DOC check, made payable to the Clerk, U.S. District Court - Oregon, in the amount of $11,611.97, and to deposit these monies into a non-interest bearing account. 2. Counsel presenting this Order must serve a copy personally on the Clerk of Court and on the Clerk's Financial Administrator, before the Clerk will take any action on this order. 3. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon is absolved of any liability by compliance with this Order. 4. It shall be counsel's responsibility to confirm any action required by this Order to be performed by the Clerk or her designee. IT IS SO ORDERED this pt.fday of June, 2011. District Judge cc: Counsel of Record Clerk, US District Court Chief Financial Administrator, Clerk's Office (Portland) Page 2 - ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS \\RLF·FSIRLF\CLlENTS\7000\7301.238IlNTERPlEADER CASE\ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS-REVIS ED.DOC For Court Use Only APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~y: Financial AdTninistrator Page 3 - ORDER TO DEPOSIT FUNDS \\RlF·FS\AlACUENTS\700017301.2381INTERPlEADER CASE\OROER TO DEPOSIT FUNOS.REVJSED.OOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?