Bylsma v. Burger King Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 23 Of Magistrate Judge Papak. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 14 is GRANTED. Signed on 11/9/10 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (cib)

Bylsma v. Burger King Corporation et al

Doc. 27

IN THE UNITED STATES D I S T R I C T COURT FOR THE D I S T R I C T OF OREGON Portland Division EDWARD J . BYLSMA, Plaintiff,

C i v i l No. 10-CV-403-PK ORDER

v.
BURGER KING CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; a n d KAIZEN RESTAURANTS, INC., an Oregon Corporation Defendant. BARRY J . GOEHLER 121 S.W. Salmon S t r e e t , Suite 1100 P o r t l a n d , OR 9 7 2 0 4 [phone] "GARY M. BULLOCK G a r y M. B u l l o c k & A s s o c i a t e s , P . C . 1000 S.W. Broadway, Suite 2460 P o r t l a n d , OR 9 7 2 0 5 [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff

1 - ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

ANNE M. BREMNER JAMES T . YAND DARRIN E . BAILEY Stafford Frey Cooper 601 Union S t r e e t , Suite 3100 S e a t t l e , WA 9 8 1 0 1 [phone] MARSH, J u d g e . Magistrate Judge Papak f i l e d a Findings and Recommendation on September 3, 2010. 28 U.S.C.
§

T h e m a t t e r i s now b e f o r e me p u r s u a n t t o When a n y o f

6 3 6 ( b ) ( 1 ) (B) a n d F e d . R . C i v . P . 7 2 ( b ) .

the parties object to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the d i s t r i c t court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (C)i McDonnell Douglas Corp.

v. Commodore Business Machines, I n c . , 656 F.2d1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), c e r t . denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). Defendant has filed timely objections. review, I find no error. After de novo

A c c o r d i n g l y , I ADOPT t h e F i n d i n g s a n d

Recommendation (#23) of Magistrate Judge Papak. Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (#14) i s
GRANTED.

I T I S SO ORDERED. DATED t h i s _ _ _ ~ d a y o f N o v e m b e r , 2 0 1 0 . ~

Malcolm F. Marsh United States District Judge

~~~

2 - ORDER