Mersch v. Coursey

Filing 31

JUDGMENT: Based on the Record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. The court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability on the basis that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed on August 19th, 2011 by Judge Michael W. Mosman. (eo)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION ROBERT T. MERSCH, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. RICK COURSEY, Respondent. Civil No. 10-538-MO JUDGMENT MOSMAN, District Judge. Based on the Record, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this Action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. The Appealability substantial on court the showing declines basis of that the denial pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2). to issue petitioner of a a Certificate has not constitutional 19th day of August, 2011. /s/ Michael W. Mosman Michael W. Mosman United States District Judge 1 - JUDGMENT a right Pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. DATED this made of

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?