Michaels v. Taco Bell Corporation

Filing 166

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S SPECIAL DAMAGES - Dated this 29th day of October, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (see attached 2-page order) (peg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
PORTLAND DIVISION

JEANNE MICHAELS,

3: I 0-cv-1 051-AC
Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S
SPECIAL DAMAGES

v.
TACO BELL CORPORATION, a California
corporation
Defendant.

ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge:
Defendant's objections to Plaintiffs itemized list of special damages are based on its
Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Opinions of Michelle Nielsen (Dkt. No. 120). For the
reasons set forth in the comt's Ruling on Defendant's Motion in Limine No. 120, Defendant's
objections are OVERRULED IN PART, DEFERRED IN PART.
The rulings in this order resolve objections as of October 17,2012, the date by which,
under the court's scheduling orders for the October 29,2012, trial date, the parties' respective

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S SPECIAL DAMAGES

I

objections and responses to objections were to be filed. At the October 23, 2012, status
conference in this case the court rescheduled the trial to Apri122, 2013, and set dates by which
the parties would file their respective supplemental pretrial documents, including Plaintiffs
itemized list of special damages and Defendant's objections thereto. The court will rule on those
objections at the pretrial conference scheduled for the April16, 2013.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Z)j,

DATED thisc

day of October, 2012.

//.~ . . . (;\j,/2£<1----JOJ V~
Sta~e~

United

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S SPECIAL DAMAGES

2

ACOSTA
Magistrate Judge