Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
25
ORDER. The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation 23 . The Commissioner's final decision denying plaintiff's claim for SSI benefits is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 05/07/2012 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Portland Division
SEPHAN M. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 3:11-CV-00254-PK
ORDER
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant.
MARSH, Judge.
On April 2, 2012, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued
Findings and Recommendation (doc. 23), in which he recommends
the Commissioner's January 29, 2011, final decision denying
plaintiff's application for childhood Supplemental Security
Income (SSI) benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security
Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-83f should be affirmed.
The matter is
now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
1 - ORDER
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings
and Recommendation were timely filed, the court is relieved of
its obligation to review the record de novo.
United States v.
Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003 (en banc).
See
also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir.
1988).
Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the court
does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and
Recommendation (#23).
The Commissioner's final decision denying
plaintiff's claim for SSI benefits is AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this
?
day of May, 2012.
tK~~~~
Malcolm F. Marsh
united States District Judge
2 -
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?